Panelboard indicators, recorders, and controllers, receiver industrial process-type, manufacturing · Massachusetts

Iwaki America Inc.

Holliston, MA · ~124 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Iwaki America Inc. runs at 30% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Panelboard indicators, recorders, and controllers, receiver industrial process-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Iwaki America Inc.: 1.0 TCR = 30% of Panelboard indicators, recorders, and controllers, receiver industrial process-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Iwaki America Inc. safety composite

Iwaki America Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Iwaki America Inc. held a steady TCR band

Iwaki America Inc.'s TCR held near 0.1 from 1.0 in 2021 to 1.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=1.0 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334513 · Holliston, MA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 30% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/21
  • PHOTO Mettler Toledo Proce…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~124 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mettler Toledo Process Analytics (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Iwaki America Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Iwaki America Inc. averages 1.0 TCR (30% of the Panelboard indicators, recorders, and controllers, receiver industrial process-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Iwaki America Inc. TCR series: 2021=1 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Iwaki America Inc. falls in its industry

322 Panelboard indicators, recorde establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 21 Panelboard indicators, recorde employers in Massachusetts.

Iwaki America Inc. (124 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Iwaki America Inc.
Iwaki America Inc. (124 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Iwaki America Inc. has more employees than the Panelboard indicators, recorders, and co median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2022 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2021 1.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334513 · MA · Holliston

322 Panelboard indicators, recorders, and controllers, receiver industrial process-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 24 employers in Holliston, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mettler Toledo Process Analytics 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Endress+Hauser USA 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR S.J. Electro Systems, Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Renishaw Inc-West Dundee, IL 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Otis Elevator Company-NAES Boston 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steele Canvas Basket Corporation 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wyman Gordon Company 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Circor Naval Solutions Warren 124 FTE
CITY-NEAR New England (10) 983 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wayne J. Griffin Electric Inc. - Holliston 907 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rodenhiser Home Services 176 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holliston MFG (GTS, HTSG) 166 FTE
NAT-TCR Euless 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR HANOVER - Corporate Office 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 910 Louisiana 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Shelterhouse 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Alcon Industries Inc 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trace Ambulance Services Inc 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE B.R Funsten & Co 02 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0798 - Town Country 124 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.