Stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), metal, unfinished, manufacturing · Ohio

J B Stamping, Inc

Cleveland, OH · ~39 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

J B Stamping, Inc runs at 25% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), metal, unfinished, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

J B Stamping, Inc: 0.8 TCR = 25% of Stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), metal, unfinished, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

J B Stamping, Inc safety composite

J B Stamping, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

J B Stamping, Inc held a steady TCR band

J B Stamping, Inc's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.3 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332119 · Cleveland, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 25% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/70
  • PHOTO Liberty Steel Indust…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Liberty Steel Industries Pressed Products (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

J B Stamping, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows J B Stamping, Inc averages 0.8 TCR (25% of the Stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), metal, unfinished, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

J B Stamping, Inc TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.3 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where J B Stamping, Inc falls in its industry

477 Stampings (except automotive, establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 70 Stampings (except automotive, employers in Ohio.

J B Stamping, Inc (39 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate J B Stamping, Inc
J B Stamping, Inc (39 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1

J B Stamping, Inc has fewer employees than the Stampings (except automotive, cans, coin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332119 · OH · Cleveland

477 Stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), metal, unfinished, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 922 employers in Cleveland, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Liberty Steel Industries Pressed Products 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cygnet Stamping & Fabricating, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parkway Metal Products, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR MSK Precision Products 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE DRW PACKING INC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE OHI Greenhouse LLC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bridgewater Dairy LLC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rossburg Facility 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland Clinic Main Campus 25,629 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Cleveland Clinic Foundation 20,763 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland Medical Center 10,377 FTE
CITY-NEAR SILCO FIRE & SECURITY - CLEVELAND 3,641 FTE
NAT-TCR Corporate 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Wolverine Constructors Inc 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR King County Human Resources 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Orlando 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Thiele Tanning Co 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gaston Brothers Utilities, LLC 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thermo Tech Mechanical Insulation, Inc. 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carefree Cottages of Maplewood - Chateau 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.