Inhalators, surgical and medical, manufacturing · Minnesota

Jabil Healthcare - Distribution

Brooklyn Park, MN · ~24 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jabil Healthcare - Distribution runs at 25% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Inhalators, surgical and medical, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Jabil Healthcare - Distribution: 0.8 TCR = 25% of Inhalators, surgical and medical, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jabil Healthcare - Distribution safety composite

Jabil Healthcare - Distribution scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Jabil Healthcare - Distribution held a steady TCR band

Jabil Healthcare - Distribution's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=4.9 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339112 · Brooklyn Park, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 25% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #24/56
  • PHOTO KARL STORZ Endoscopy…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KARL STORZ Endoscopy-America, Inc. - El Segundo (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Jabil Healthcare - Distribution in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jabil Healthcare - Distribution averages 0.8 TCR (25% of the Inhalators, surgical and medical, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jabil Healthcare - Distribution TCR series: 2018=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=4.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Jabil Healthcare - Distribution falls in its industry

741 Inhalators, surgical and medic establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 56 Inhalators, surgical and medic employers in Minnesota.

Jabil Healthcare - Distribution (24 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Jabil Healthcare - Distribution
Jabil Healthcare - Distribution (24 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Jabil Healthcare - Distribution has fewer employees than the Inhalators, surgical and medical, manufa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.9 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339112 · MN · Brooklyn Park

741 Inhalators, surgical and medical, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 226 employers in Brooklyn Park, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KARL STORZ Endoscopy-America, Inc. - El Segundo 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precision Medical Technologies 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Westminster Main Office 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Intuitive Surgical 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE United Dairy, Cottonwood Dairy 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE WPI-Office 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Production Services - Jackson 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pipestone Repairs and Maintenance 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0591 - Target Northern Campus 5,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMRG 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Retail Merchandising Services 1,399 FTE
CITY-NEAR Egan Company 962 FTE
NAT-TCR Liberty Steel Industries Pressed Products 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Fraticelli Trucking Company, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Truitt Oilfield Maintenance Corp. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Oil Spill Response USA Inc 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE B80 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trinity Surfaces Orlando 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oregon 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grocery Outlet of Anderson 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.