Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing · North Carolina

Jabil Packaging Solutions

Mebane, NC · ~236 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jabil Packaging Solutions runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Jabil Packaging Solutions: 1.4 TCR = 42% of Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jabil Packaging Solutions safety composite

Jabil Packaging Solutions scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2017→2024

Jabil Packaging Solutions injury rate improved

Jabil Packaging Solutions's TCR fell 0.4 from 1.5 in 2017 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.5 · 2019=2.6 · 2022=0.5 · 2024=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Mebane, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #29/132
  • PHOTO Silver Line Buildin…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~236 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Silver Line Building Products (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Jabil Packaging Solutions in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jabil Packaging Solutions averages 1.4 TCR (42% of the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jabil Packaging Solutions TCR series: 2017=1.5 · 2019=2.6 · 2022=0.5 · 2024=1 · BLS 3.3

Where Jabil Packaging Solutions falls in its industry

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 132 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli employers in North Carolina.

Jabil Packaging Solutions (236 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Jabil Packaging Solutions
Jabil Packaging Solutions (236 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Jabil Packaging Solutions has more employees than the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubb median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 0.5 2 0 0
2022 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2019 2.6 1.4 9 0 0
2017 1.5 0.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · NC · Mebane

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 71 employers in Mebane, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Silver Line Building Products 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Placon Madison 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Food Packaging : MINERAL WELLS 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Poly Processing Company, LLC Monroe 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pike Virginia Statewide Operations 236 FTE
STATE-SIZE NC/SC (50) 236 FTE
STATE-SIZE Keeco Fayetteville 236 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wagram, NC 236 FTE
CITY-NEAR GKN Alamance 912 FTE
CITY-NEAR IS - MFG US - Mebane, NC 642 FTE
CITY-NEAR Industrial Solutions : IS - MFG US - Mebane, NC 642 FTE
CITY-NEAR Industrial Connections and Solutions LLC 620 FTE
NAT-TCR EKAM Hospitality LLC 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Glades Health Care Center 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Community Printers 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR The Fresh Market 221 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE WeldFit Corporation 236 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meggitt-Portland 236 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chenango Forks Central School District 236 FTE
NAT-SIZE RiverBend Materials 236 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.