Industrial process piping installation · New Mexico

Jack's Mechanical Solutions, Inc.

Albuquerque, NM · ~109 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jack's Mechanical Solutions, Inc. runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Industrial process piping installation workplace, earning a grade A.

Jack's Mechanical Solutions, Inc.: 0.6 TCR = 21% of Industrial process piping installation BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jack's Mechanical Solutions, Inc. safety composite

Jack's Mechanical Solutions, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Jack's Mechanical Solutions, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Jack's Mechanical Solutions, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=1.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Albuquerque, NM AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/32
  • PHOTO Minneapolis
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~109 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Minneapolis (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Mexico employers → · Look up another →

Jack's Mechanical Solutions, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jack's Mechanical Solutions, Inc. averages 0.6 TCR (21% of the Industrial process piping installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jack's Mechanical Solutions, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=0 · 2019=1 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Jack's Mechanical Solutions, Inc. falls in its industry

5,793 Industrial process piping inst establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Mexico alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 32 Industrial process piping inst employers in New Mexico.

Jack's Mechanical Solutions, Inc. (109 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Jack's Mechanical Solutions, Inc.
Jack's Mechanical Solutions, Inc. (109 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Jack's Mechanical Solutions, Inc. has more employees than the Industrial process piping installation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.6 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · NM · Albuquerque

5,793 Industrial process piping installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,241 rated employers in New Mexico with headcount on file · 944 employers in Albuquerque, NM · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Minneapolis 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4758_10853 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Calvert Mechanical Systems 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR National Fire & Life Safety 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Burgos Group 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE USM Store #939 (ALBERTSONS MARKET) 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1047 - Albuquerque NW 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE CTP - HOLLOMAN AFB, NM 109 FTE
CITY-NEAR NM-01 4,429 FTE
CITY-NEAR Presbyterian Hospital 4,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cooper Administrative Center 3,531 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - ABQ1 1,917 FTE
NAT-TCR Estee Lauder - Trevose 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR DKB, Inc. Idaho Branch 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Cahokia 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Tuscola 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chase Lenoir 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diversicare of Riverchase 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pearsall Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coextruded Plastic Technologies, Inc. 109 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.