Base facilities operation support services · Georgia

Jacobs - ATLANTA AIRLINES TERMINAL - OMI

Atlanta, GA · ~119 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jacobs - ATLANTA AIRLINES TERMINAL - OMI runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Base facilities operation support services workplace, earning a grade B.

Jacobs - ATLANTA AIRLINES TERMINAL - OMI: 1.6 TCR = 60% of Base facilities operation support services BLS 2.6 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jacobs - ATLANTA AIRLINES TERMINAL - OMI safety composite

Jacobs - ATLANTA AIRLINES TERMINAL - OMI scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Jacobs - ATLANTA AIRLINES TERMINAL - OMI: 0.0 → 1.6 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 2.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.06× in 2024

Jacobs - ATLANTA AIRLINES TERMINAL - OMI's TCR rose 1.6 from 0.0 in 2018 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.06× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561210 · Atlanta, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 60% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #18/36
  • PHOTO Cisco SJO 02
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~119 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cisco SJO 02 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Jacobs - ATLANTA AIRLINES TERMINAL - OMI in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jacobs - ATLANTA AIRLINES TERMINAL - OMI averages 1.6 TCR (60% of the Base facilities operation support services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jacobs - ATLANTA AIRLINES TERMINAL - OMI TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=2 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=2 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 2.6

Where Jacobs - ATLANTA AIRLINES TERMINAL - OMI falls in its industry

757 Base facilities operation supp establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 36 Base facilities operation supp employers in Georgia.

Jacobs - ATLANTA AIRLINES TERMINAL - OMI (119 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Jacobs - ATLANTA AIRLINES TERMINAL - OMI
Jacobs - ATLANTA AIRLINES TERMINAL - OMI (119 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Jacobs - ATLANTA AIRLINES TERMINAL - OMI has more employees than the Base facilities operation support servic median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 1.6 2 0 0
2023 1.6 1.6 2 0 0
2022 2.7 2.7 3 0 0
2021 2.0 2.0 2 0 0
2020 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2019 2.0 1.0 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561210 · GA · Atlanta

757 Base facilities operation support services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cisco SJO 02 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR WeSolve Workplace Environments Inc 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR BGIS Global Integrated Solutions US, LLC 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mann Mechanical 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE 060 Dublin 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Terrapin Beer Company-Athens 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kamps Pallets Atlanta Jonesboro 119 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Specialty Fabrication LLC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR County of York/Information Technology 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Smg Plymouth Meeting LLC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bell Nursery - Marydel 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Montecito Heights 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stillwater Health Care 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE NA-US-CA-Fremont-1055 Page Road 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manhattan Beach Toyota 119 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.