Heating contractors · Oregon

Jacobs Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc.

Portland, OR · ~118 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jacobs Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc. runs at 174% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Heating contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Jacobs Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc.: 4.9 TCR = 174% of Heating contractors BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jacobs Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc. safety composite

Jacobs Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2017→2023

Jacobs Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc. injury rate improved

Jacobs Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.6 from 6.6 in 2017 to 6.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.6 · 2018=5.4 · 2019=5.5 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=3.0 · 2023=6.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Portland, OR ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 174% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #49/86
  • PHOTO Central Stainless Inc.
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~118 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Central Stainless Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Jacobs Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jacobs Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc. averages 4.9 TCR (174% of the Heating contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jacobs Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc. TCR series: 2017=6.6 · 2018=5.4 · 2019=5.5 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=3 · 2023=6 · BLS 2.8

Where Jacobs Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc. falls in its industry

5,793 Heating contractors establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #49 safest of 86 Heating contractors employers in Oregon.

Jacobs Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc. (118 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Jacobs Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc.
Jacobs Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc. (118 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Jacobs Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc. has more employees than the Heating contractors median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.0 1.7 7 0 0
2022 3.0 1.0 3 0 0
2021 2.6 2.6 3 0 0
2019 5.5 3.1 7 0 0
2018 5.4 3.1 7 0 0
2017 6.6 6.6 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · OR · Portland

5,793 Heating contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Central Stainless Inc. 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mainline Fire Protection - Springfield 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Legacy Mechanical Inc 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CCS Mechanical, Inc. 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Teufel Holly Farms 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hood River Juice Company Plant 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oregon Truss Co Inc 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE SWY-0019-0019-00525 FAC-00525-MEDFORD-OR 118 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR CI - Clive 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Mainline Fire Protection - Springfield 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Case Goods/Corp Office/Upholstery 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bronco Wine Company 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Anniston West Warehouse 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE New England Life Flight 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE KS Energy Services (Denmark) 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Velvet Ice Cream Co - Utica 118 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.