Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system · Arizona

Jacobs - IBM UA TECH PARK - OMI

Tucson, AZ · ~25 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jacobs - IBM UA TECH PARK - OMI runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system workplace, earning a grade C.

Jacobs - IBM UA TECH PARK - OMI: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jacobs - IBM UA TECH PARK - OMI safety composite

Jacobs - IBM UA TECH PARK - OMI scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Jacobs - IBM UA TECH PARK - OMI held a steady TCR band

Jacobs - IBM UA TECH PARK - OMI's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.0 TCR.

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · Tucson, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/10
  • PHOTO Grandway West Office
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Grandway West Office (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Jacobs - IBM UA TECH PARK - OMI in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jacobs - IBM UA TECH PARK - OMI averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jacobs - IBM UA TECH PARK - OMI TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Jacobs - IBM UA TECH PARK - OMI falls in its industry

400 Collection, treatment, and dis establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 10 Collection, treatment, and dis employers in Arizona.

Jacobs - IBM UA TECH PARK - OMI (25 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Jacobs - IBM UA TECH PARK - OMI
Jacobs - IBM UA TECH PARK - OMI (25 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Jacobs - IBM UA TECH PARK - OMI has fewer employees than the Collection, treatment, and disposal of w median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · AZ · Tucson

400 Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 1,150 employers in Tucson, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Grandway West Office 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Office Building Annex 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Office Building Annex (MOBA) 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jacobs - CENTENNIAL - OMI 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Camelot Nurseries, Inc. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cholla Livestock 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE 7892_18701 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arlington Valley, LLC 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Arizona 18,951 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site 9,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tucson Medical Center 4,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Tucson 3,989 FTE
NAT-TCR Cedar Bay Entertainment LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health 7000 and 7200 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR One Federal Street 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Fremont - Community Support Includes Recreation and Human Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE SC Voc Rehab Richland 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE 30160 Bek Fort Worth 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE 30168 Capstone Bek Houston 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE CMC Rebar Farmersville 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.