Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system · Georgia

Jacobs - PEACHTREE CORNERS - OMI

Peachtree Corners, GA · ~26 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jacobs - PEACHTREE CORNERS - OMI runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system workplace, earning a grade C.

Jacobs - PEACHTREE CORNERS - OMI: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jacobs - PEACHTREE CORNERS - OMI safety composite

Jacobs - PEACHTREE CORNERS - OMI scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Jacobs - PEACHTREE CORNERS - OMI held a steady TCR band

Jacobs - PEACHTREE CORNERS - OMI's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.0 TCR.

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · Peachtree Corners, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/22
  • PHOTO Grandway West Office
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Grandway West Office (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Jacobs - PEACHTREE CORNERS - OMI in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jacobs - PEACHTREE CORNERS - OMI averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jacobs - PEACHTREE CORNERS - OMI TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Jacobs - PEACHTREE CORNERS - OMI falls in its industry

400 Collection, treatment, and dis establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 22 Collection, treatment, and dis employers in Georgia.

Jacobs - PEACHTREE CORNERS - OMI (26 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Jacobs - PEACHTREE CORNERS - OMI
Jacobs - PEACHTREE CORNERS - OMI (26 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Jacobs - PEACHTREE CORNERS - OMI has fewer employees than the Collection, treatment, and disposal of w median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · GA · Peachtree Corners

400 Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 36 employers in Peachtree Corners, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Grandway West Office 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Office Building Annex 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Office Building Annex (MOBA) 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jacobs - CENTENNIAL - OMI 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE FPL Food Chatel Farms 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services - Pine Grove, LA 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pilgrim's Pride Athens Hatchery 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hawkins Logging & Timber Co LLC 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Soliant Health LLC 504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pond & Company, Inc. 453 FTE
CITY-NEAR Intuitive PTC 385 FTE
CITY-NEAR NetPlanner Systems Inc. 368 FTE
NAT-TCR Binghamton 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Detroit 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Port Chester 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Richmond East 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kasson-Mantorville ISD#204 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE South Oxford Management LLC Dallas Office 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holiday Inn Express Phoenix Downtown Ballpark 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern States Anderson-Royston Service - Anderson Branch 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.