Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction · Louisiana

James Construction Group - Paving

Baton Rouge, LA · ~63 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

James Construction Group - Paving runs at 76% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction workplace, earning a grade B.

James Construction Group - Paving: 2.1 TCR = 76% of Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

James Construction Group - Paving safety composite

James Construction Group - Paving scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2020→2021

James Construction Group - Paving injury rate improved

James Construction Group - Paving's TCR fell 1.2 from 2.7 in 2020 to 1.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=2.7 · 2021=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Baton Rouge, LA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 76% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #23/33
  • PHOTO JB Coxwell Contracti…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JB Coxwell Contracting, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

James Construction Group - Paving in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows James Construction Group - Paving averages 2.1 TCR (76% of the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

James Construction Group - Paving TCR series: 2020=2.7 · 2021=1.5 · BLS 2.8

Where James Construction Group - Paving falls in its industry

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, stree establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 33 Pavement, highway, road, stree employers in Louisiana.

James Construction Group - Paving (63 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate James Construction Group - Paving
James Construction Group - Paving (63 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

James Construction Group - Paving has fewer employees than the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2020 2.7 1.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · LA · Baton Rouge

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 781 employers in Baton Rouge, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JB Coxwell Contracting, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brayman Construction Corporation 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Illini Asphalt Corporation 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wagman Heavy Civil, Inc. 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Concordia Electric Cooperative 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ratcliff Construction 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hernandez Consulting Inc 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aeon PEC 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR WEST REGION HEADQUARTERS 9,680 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brown & Root Industrial Services, LLC. 8,819 FTE
CITY-NEAR BATON ROUGE PACKERS 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baton Rouge 4,833 FTE
NAT-TCR National Rent-A-Car - J9 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Electric 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Rath LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Target (WC USX TSC) 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Octex Holdings LLC 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Laddawn, Inc. Manchester, IA 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Five Star Residences of Northwoods 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Village Creek Rehab and Nursing 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.