Drydock, floating, building · Louisiana

James Elmwood Repair and Maintenance

Belle Chasse, LA · ~31 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

James Elmwood Repair and Maintenance runs at 128% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Drydock, floating, building workplace, earning a grade D.

James Elmwood Repair and Maintenance: 4.2 TCR = 128% of Drydock, floating, building BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

James Elmwood Repair and Maintenance safety composite

James Elmwood Repair and Maintenance scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

James Elmwood Repair and Maintenance: 0.0 → 5.8 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 5.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.36× in 2023

James Elmwood Repair and Maintenance's TCR rose 5.8 from 0.0 in 2016 to 5.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336611 · Belle Chasse, LA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 128% of ind

  • DART 5.8 DART
  • RANK #41/53
  • PHOTO VTM-470 SAN DIEGO
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: VTM-470 SAN DIEGO (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

James Elmwood Repair and Maintenance in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows James Elmwood Repair and Maintenance averages 4.2 TCR (128% of the Drydock, floating, building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

James Elmwood Repair and Maintenance TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=3.6 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=5.8 · BLS 3.3

Where James Elmwood Repair and Maintenance falls in its industry

454 Drydock, floating, building establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 53 Drydock, floating, building employers in Louisiana.

James Elmwood Repair and Maintenance (31 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate James Elmwood Repair and Maintenance
James Elmwood Repair and Maintenance (31 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 4.2

James Elmwood Repair and Maintenance has fewer employees than the Drydock, floating, building median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.8 5.8 2 0 0
2022 5.2 5.2 2 0 0
2020 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2019 5.9 5.9 2 0 0
2018 4.9 2.5 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336611 · LA · Belle Chasse

454 Drydock, floating, building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 35 employers in Belle Chasse, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR VTM-470 SAN DIEGO 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shipyard-San Diego 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR GDIT Pawcatuck Mechanic St 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR IMIA, LLC Honolulu 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Planters Gin Company 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Delta Land Services, LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ninemile 6 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake Charles Power Station 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alliance Refinery 455 FTE
CITY-NEAR Downstream & Chemicals - Belle Chasse, LA Plant 408 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chevron Oronite Company LLC - Oak Point Plant 396 FTE
CITY-NEAR BrandSafway, LLC - P66 Alliance Refinery - Belle Chasse 203 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Floresville I S D 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Fiesta # 39 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Spotted Dog Ventures, LLC dba Emerson Resort & Spa 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Tongrun International 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Northern Illinois University a 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Poca 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Academy 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Recyclable LLC 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.