Food research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) · Minnesota

James Ford Bell R&D Center

Golden Valley, MN · ~1,000 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

James Ford Bell R&D Center runs at 196% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Food research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) workplace, earning a grade D.

James Ford Bell R&D Center: 1.0 TCR = 196% of Food research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) BLS 0.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

James Ford Bell R&D Center safety composite

James Ford Bell R&D Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

James Ford Bell R&D Center: 0.5 → 1.0 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 1.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.37× in 2024

James Ford Bell R&D Center's TCR rose 0.5 from 0.5 in 2022 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 1.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541712 · Golden Valley, MN ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade D · TCR 1.0 · 196% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #4/10
  • PHOTO Frontage Laboratories
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~1,000 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Frontage Laboratories (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

James Ford Bell R&D Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows James Ford Bell R&D Center averages 1.0 TCR (196% of the Food research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

James Ford Bell R&D Center TCR series: 2022=0.5 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=1 · BLS 0.5

Where James Ford Bell R&D Center falls in its industry

319 Food research and development establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 10 Food research and development employers in Minnesota.

James Ford Bell R&D Center (1,000 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate James Ford Bell R&D Center
James Ford Bell R&D Center (1,000 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8

James Ford Bell R&D Center has more employees than the Food research and development laboratori median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 0.4 8 3 0
2023 1.5 0.5 6 9 0
2022 0.5 0.3 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541712 · MN · Golden Valley

319 Food research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 115 employers in Golden Valley, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Frontage Laboratories 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Innovation Center 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mission Campus 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR R&D 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Amazon Transportation Services : MSP5 996 FTE
STATE-SIZE MTS Systems Corporation 995 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flint Hills Resources 1,006 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midway Campus 994 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Mills (Corporate) 3,932 FTE
CITY-NEAR Koch Companies 1,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR HoneywellMN10 1,388 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tennant Company Corporate Woods TSSC 936 FTE
NAT-TCR Ryder System, Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Veritas Steel LLC 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR D.R. Horton, Inc. - Huntsville 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 4604 - CQ Enterprise Str 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Linn-Benton Community College 1,000 FTE
NAT-SIZE Memorial Hermann Greater Heights Hospital 1,000 FTE
NAT-SIZE Canon U.S.A.,Inc., Melville, NY 1,000 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southwest Behavioral Health Services, Inc. 1,000 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.