Automobile dealers, new only or new and used · Michigan

James Martin Chevrolet

Detroit, MI · ~67 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

James Martin Chevrolet runs at 106% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Automobile dealers, new only or new and used workplace, earning a grade C.

James Martin Chevrolet: 3.6 TCR = 106% of Automobile dealers, new only or new and used BLS 3.4 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

James Martin Chevrolet safety composite

James Martin Chevrolet scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2024

James Martin Chevrolet injury rate improved

James Martin Chevrolet's TCR fell 1.4 from 3.0 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 8.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.0 · 2017=7.1 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=8.1 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 441110 · Detroit, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 106% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #68/106
  • PHOTO New Braunfels
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: New Braunfels (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

James Martin Chevrolet in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows James Martin Chevrolet averages 3.6 TCR (106% of the Automobile dealers, new only or new and used BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

James Martin Chevrolet TCR series: 2016=3 · 2017=7.1 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=8.1 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 3.4

Where James Martin Chevrolet falls in its industry

2,847 Automobile dealers, new only o establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #68 safest of 106 Automobile dealers, new only o employers in Michigan.

James Martin Chevrolet (67 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate James Martin Chevrolet
James Martin Chevrolet (67 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3

James Martin Chevrolet has fewer employees than the Automobile dealers, new only or new and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 6.6 3.3 3 1 0
2021 8.1 0.0 5 0 0
2020 3.3 3.3 2 0 0
2019 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2018 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2017 7.1 1.4 5 0 0
2016 3.0 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

441110 · MI · Detroit

2,847 Automobile dealers, new only or new and used employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 673 employers in Detroit, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR New Braunfels 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valenti Cadillac LLC 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gilleland Enterprises, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Price Ford, Imc 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cadillac SC 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE CS Erickson 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hamilton Contracting LLC 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Leading Edge - Wyoming 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford Hospital 8,838 FTE
CITY-NEAR Detroit Campus 8,632 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - DTW 6,640 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Motors Corporation 5,241 FTE
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn East Lake Forest-Irvine 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 98762 - Liberty Angora 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Page Steel Inc 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Marriott Hotel & Golf Club at Champions Circle 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Egan WRP 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foremost Farms USA (Marshfield, WI) 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hmh - Hhp 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Carlos Office 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.