Ambulance services, air or ground · West Virginia

Jan-Care South Charleston Station

South Charleston, WV · ~21 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jan-Care South Charleston Station runs at 436% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Ambulance services, air or ground workplace, earning a grade F.

Jan-Care South Charleston Station: 16.6 TCR = 436% of Ambulance services, air or ground BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jan-Care South Charleston Station safety composite

Jan-Care South Charleston Station scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.8

2018→2019

Jan-Care South Charleston Station injury rate improved

Jan-Care South Charleston Station's TCR fell 5.8 from 19.4 in 2018 to 13.7 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 19.4 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=19.4 · 2019=13.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621910 · South Charleston, WV ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.6 · 436% of ind

  • DART 10.2 DART
  • RANK #10/14
  • PHOTO East Texas Medical C…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: East Texas Medical Center Emergency Medical Sercvices (Henderson County) (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · West Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Jan-Care South Charleston Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jan-Care South Charleston Station averages 16.6 TCR (436% of the Ambulance services, air or ground BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jan-Care South Charleston Station TCR series: 2018=19.4 · 2019=13.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Jan-Care South Charleston Station falls in its industry

976 Ambulance services, air or gro establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to West Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 14 Ambulance services, air or gro employers in West Virginia.

Jan-Care South Charleston Station (21 employees, TCR 16.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 8.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Jan-Care South Charleston Station
Jan-Care South Charleston Station (21 employees, TCR 16.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 8.3

Jan-Care South Charleston Station has fewer employees than the Ambulance services, air or ground median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 13.7 10.2 4 0 0
2018 19.4 15.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621910 · WV · South Charleston

976 Ambulance services, air or ground employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,269 rated employers in West Virginia with headcount on file · 36 employers in South Charleston, WV · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR East Texas Medical Center Emergency Medical Sercvices (Henderson County) 16.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seals Ambulance Service 16.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main - ST4 16.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Concord Station 16.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hydrocarbon Well Service Inc 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spencer 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-State Roofing & Sheet Metal Company 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willow Island Facility 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomas Health Systems, INC 1,257 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomas Memorial Hospital 1,170 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gestamp WV 612 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gestamp West Virginia, LLC 564 FTE
NAT-TCR Rosewood Manor 16.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Jackson Center (Wyjak) 16.6 TCR
NAT-TCR AngelosPrime Bar&Grl 16.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 161565-Chi-Morgan Park Sta 16.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lake Marion (Santee) - Resort 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Marine Store #564 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE All-Phase Electric Supply (Pc4169) 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Citrus Park 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.