Landing mats, aircraft, metal, manufacturing · New York

Jaquith Industries, Inc.

Syracuse, NY · ~66 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jaquith Industries, Inc. runs at 313% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Landing mats, aircraft, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Jaquith Industries, Inc.: 10.3 TCR = 313% of Landing mats, aircraft, metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jaquith Industries, Inc. safety composite

Jaquith Industries, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2017→2024

Jaquith Industries, Inc. injury rate improved

Jaquith Industries, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.7 from 6.7 in 2017 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 19.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.7 · 2020=9.9 · 2021=16.3 · 2022=19.8 · 2023=6.2 · 2024=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332312 · Syracuse, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.3 · 313% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #42/46
  • PHOTO American Highway (A …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: American Highway (A Simplex Company) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Jaquith Industries, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jaquith Industries, Inc. averages 10.3 TCR (313% of the Landing mats, aircraft, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jaquith Industries, Inc. TCR series: 2017=6.7 · 2020=9.9 · 2021=16.3 · 2022=19.8 · 2023=6.2 · 2024=3 · BLS 3.3

Where Jaquith Industries, Inc. falls in its industry

1,491 Landing mats, aircraft, metal, establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 46 Landing mats, aircraft, metal, employers in New York.

Jaquith Industries, Inc. (66 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Jaquith Industries, Inc.
Jaquith Industries, Inc. (66 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Jaquith Industries, Inc. has more employees than the Landing mats, aircraft, metal, manufactu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 1.5 2 0 0
2023 6.2 4.6 3 1 0
2022 19.8 10.7 11 2 0
2021 16.3 14.8 11 0 0
2020 9.9 8.3 6 0 0
2017 6.7 5.0 2 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332312 · NY · Syracuse

1,491 Landing mats, aircraft, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 436 employers in Syracuse, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR American Highway (A Simplex Company) 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metal Form 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR KASCO STRUCTURES LLC 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Modern Welding Company of Kentucky, Inc. (Elizabethtown) 10.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Vireo Health of NY - Johnstown 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mammoser Farms 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE H.H. Dobbins Inc. 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Merrick District 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Health 4,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY 3,970 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center 3,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center-SJH-NY 2,803 FTE
NAT-TCR American Highway (A Simplex Company) 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ellen Memorial, LLC 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 2224 - McAllen Northwest 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 1853 - Ortega 10.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Peterson Medical Associates 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE BNA 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE ACI NW inc. Civil 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clarksville 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.