Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded), manufacturing · Indiana

Jasper Rubber Products

Jasper, IN · ~444 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jasper Rubber Products runs at 174% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Jasper Rubber Products: 5.7 TCR = 174% of Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jasper Rubber Products safety composite

Jasper Rubber Products scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.6

2016→2024

Jasper Rubber Products injury rate improved

Jasper Rubber Products's TCR fell 5.6 from 8.6 in 2016 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.6 · 2019=6.9 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=5.4 · 2022=4.4 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326291 · Jasper, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 174% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #15/20
  • PHOTO SaarGummi Tennessee …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 176 inj
  • SIZE ~444 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SaarGummi Tennessee Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Jasper Rubber Products in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jasper Rubber Products averages 5.7 TCR (174% of the Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jasper Rubber Products TCR series: 2016=8.6 · 2019=6.9 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=5.4 · 2022=4.4 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=3 · BLS 3.3

Where Jasper Rubber Products falls in its industry

266 Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e. establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 20 Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e. employers in Indiana.

Jasper Rubber Products (444 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Jasper Rubber Products
Jasper Rubber Products (444 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Jasper Rubber Products has more employees than the Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e., extrude median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 1.8 10 0 0
2023 4.7 1.8 13 5 0
2022 4.4 1.3 21 0 0
2021 5.4 2.3 23 3 0
2020 7.1 4.0 28 6 0
2019 6.9 2.7 33 5 0
2016 8.6 6.3 48 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326291 · IN · Jasper

266 Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 81 employers in Jasper, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SaarGummi Tennessee Inc. 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hudson, NH 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR VIP Rubber Company Inc. 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Contitech Thermopol LLC 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Monogram Comfort Foods LLC 444 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farbest Foods Vincennes 445 FTE
STATE-SIZE INDIANAPOLIS IN (GATORADE) 445 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nippon Steel Pipe America Inc 443 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital and Health Care Center 1,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kimball Electronics 809 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kimball Electronics Jasper 610 FTE
CITY-NEAR MasterBrand Cabinets, Inc. Jasper, IN 520 FTE
NAT-TCR Best Way Disposal Inc., Watervliet 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Orangeburg - Compound Plant 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Edgerton, Kansas 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR XAE 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Heyl Truck Lines, Inc. 444 FTE
NAT-SIZE CAES Systems LLC - Lansdale 444 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sugar Creek Packing Company Dayton Campus 444 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rogers Corporation 444 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.