Lightning protection equipment (e.g., lightning rod) installation · Florida

Jasper Thompson Lightning Protection, Inc.

Kissimmee, FL · ~33 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jasper Thompson Lightning Protection, Inc. runs at 264% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Lightning protection equipment (e.g., lightning rod) installation workplace, earning a grade F.

Jasper Thompson Lightning Protection, Inc.: 7.4 TCR = 264% of Lightning protection equipment (e.g., lightning rod) installation BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jasper Thompson Lightning Protection, Inc. safety composite

Jasper Thompson Lightning Protection, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2016→2018

Jasper Thompson Lightning Protection, Inc. injury rate improved

Jasper Thompson Lightning Protection, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.9 from 9.3 in 2016 to 5.4 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.3 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.3 · 2018=5.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · Kissimmee, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.4 · 264% of ind

  • DART 5.4 DART
  • RANK #65/70
  • PHOTO Texarkana
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Texarkana (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Jasper Thompson Lightning Protection, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jasper Thompson Lightning Protection, Inc. averages 7.4 TCR (264% of the Lightning protection equipment (e.g., lightning rod) installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jasper Thompson Lightning Protection, Inc. TCR series: 2016=9.3 · 2018=5.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Jasper Thompson Lightning Protection, Inc. falls in its industry

1,138 Lightning protection equipment establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #65 safest of 70 Lightning protection equipment employers in Florida.

Jasper Thompson Lightning Protection, Inc. (33 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Jasper Thompson Lightning Protection, Inc.
Jasper Thompson Lightning Protection, Inc. (33 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Jasper Thompson Lightning Protection, Inc. has fewer employees than the Lightning protection equipment (e.g., li median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 5.4 5.4 2 0 0
2016 9.3 9.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · FL · Kissimmee

1,138 Lightning protection equipment (e.g., lightning rod) installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 245 employers in Kissimmee, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Texarkana 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR NORTHWEST PETROLEUM SERVICE, INC 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR R & S MANUFACTURING, INC 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Magic Orrville 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Yee Farms Inc. 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE OZBLU USA LLC 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE POK-Okeechobee Clean Energy Center 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant City Office 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gaylord Palms Resort and Convention Center 1,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR OSCEOLA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 1,660 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCA Florida Osceola Hospital 1,617 FTE
CITY-NEAR SUNEAST 1,386 FTE
NAT-TCR Alliance Industries - Marinette 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR NAPP Timber & Lumber 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Iberia Extended Care Hospital 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Select Specialty Hospital - Lexington, Inc. 7.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE A&D Supply of Okc, Inc 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Three Rivers Surgical Care 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercedes Facility 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ambulance 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.