Retaining wall (except anchored earth), poured concrete, construction · Kentucky

JC Brewer Construction

Bowling Green, KY · ~41 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

JC Brewer Construction runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Retaining wall (except anchored earth), poured concrete, construction workplace, earning a grade B.

JC Brewer Construction: 2.1 TCR = 74% of Retaining wall (except anchored earth), poured concrete, construction BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

JC Brewer Construction safety composite

JC Brewer Construction scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

JC Brewer Construction: 0.0 → 4.3 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 4.3 TCR · DART/TCR 2.07× in 2023

JC Brewer Construction's TCR rose 4.3 from 0.0 in 2017 to 4.3 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 2.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238110 · Bowling Green, KY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 74% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #7/12
  • PHOTO Buck Overby Construc…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Buck Overby Construction, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

JC Brewer Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows JC Brewer Construction averages 2.1 TCR (74% of the Retaining wall (except anchored earth), poured concrete, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

JC Brewer Construction TCR series: 2017=0 · 2020=4 · 2022=0 · 2023=4.3 · BLS 2.8

Where JC Brewer Construction falls in its industry

1,314 Retaining wall (except anchore establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 12 Retaining wall (except anchore employers in Kentucky.

JC Brewer Construction (41 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate JC Brewer Construction
JC Brewer Construction (41 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8

JC Brewer Construction has fewer employees than the Retaining wall (except anchored earth), median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.3 4.3 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.0 4.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238110 · KY · Bowling Green

1,314 Retaining wall (except anchored earth), poured concrete, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 331 employers in Bowling Green, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Buck Overby Construction, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cali Built Construction 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Unlimited Concrete & Asphalt LLC 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR DN Tanks LLC 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Murray Electric System 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electric Operations 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate Services - Belfry 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE E H Construction LLC 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western Kentucky University-Bowling Green 2,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Medical Center at Bowling Green 1,872 FTE
CITY-NEAR Magna Bowling Green Metalforming 1,441 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bowling Green Metalforming 1,344 FTE
NAT-TCR Textron Aviation Greensboro Service Center 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Amanti Art 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Medical Grouop of the Carolinas 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Whirlpool Corporation - Greenville 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ind School District #0577 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southview - Willows of Arbor Lakes 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE ERI Aurora, CO 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oceans, Reefs & Aquariums, LLC 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.