Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors · Tennessee

JC Curtis Construction Co., LLC

Chattanooga, TN · ~33 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

JC Curtis Construction Co., LLC runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

JC Curtis Construction Co., LLC: 1.8 TCR = 61% of Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

JC Curtis Construction Co., LLC safety composite

JC Curtis Construction Co., LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2023→2024

JC Curtis Construction Co., LLC injury rate improved

JC Curtis Construction Co., LLC's TCR fell 3.5 from 3.5 in 2023 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=3.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Chattanooga, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 61% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/17
  • PHOTO CR Meyer and Sons Co.
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CR Meyer and Sons Co. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

JC Curtis Construction Co., LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows JC Curtis Construction Co., LLC averages 1.8 TCR (61% of the Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

JC Curtis Construction Co., LLC TCR series: 2023=3.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where JC Curtis Construction Co., LLC falls in its industry

924 Industrial building (except wa establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 17 Industrial building (except wa employers in Tennessee.

JC Curtis Construction Co., LLC (33 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate JC Curtis Construction Co., LLC
JC Curtis Construction Co., LLC (33 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

JC Curtis Construction Co., LLC has fewer employees than the Industrial building (except warehouses) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · TN · Chattanooga

924 Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 695 employers in Chattanooga, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CR Meyer and Sons Co. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fitts and Goodwin, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 194793 Loggerhead Solar 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR AES Clean Technology 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hamilton County WWTA (Water & Wastewater Treatment Authority) 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE TDH Inc 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE ORION 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Robert S. Biscan & Company 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHATTANOOGA COKE 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHATTANOOGA FOOD 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR USXpress 7,385 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cardiology GB 6,606 FTE
NAT-TCR Keasbey 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR On Computer Services dba Unified Power LLC 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Philly's Best Steak Company Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR A.F. Smith Electric, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE River Vista Farms LLC 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Franklin Shop 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greendell Landscape Solutions 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Affordable Truss Inc. 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.