Screen printing apparel and textile products (e.g. caps, napkins, placemats, T-shirts, towels) (except grey goods) · California

J.Carroll

San Luis Obispo, CA · ~24 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

J.Carroll runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Screen printing apparel and textile products (e.g. caps, napkins, placemats, T-shirts, towels) (except grey goods) workplace, earning a grade B.

J.Carroll: 2.4 TCR = 73% of Screen printing apparel and textile products (e.g. caps, napkins, placemats, T-shirts, towels) (except grey goods) BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

J.Carroll safety composite

J.Carroll scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2017→2023

J.Carroll injury rate improved

J.Carroll's TCR fell 3.8 from 3.8 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.8 · 2018=8.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=4.9 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323113 · San Luis Obispo, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 73% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/12
  • PHOTO Dprint - 2710 New Ta…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dprint - 2710 New Tampa Hwy (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

J.Carroll in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows J.Carroll averages 2.4 TCR (73% of the Screen printing apparel and textile products (e.g. caps, napkins, placemats, T-shirts, towels) (except grey goods) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

J.Carroll TCR series: 2017=3.8 · 2018=8.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=4.9 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where J.Carroll falls in its industry

200 Screen printing apparel and te establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 12 Screen printing apparel and te employers in California.

J.Carroll (24 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate J.Carroll
J.Carroll (24 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.7

J.Carroll has fewer employees than the Screen printing apparel and textile prod median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.9 4.9 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 8.1 4.1 2 0 0
2017 3.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323113 · CA · San Luis Obispo

200 Screen printing apparel and textile products (e.g. caps, napkins, placemats, T-shirts, towels) (except grey goods) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 177 employers in San Luis Obispo, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dprint - 2710 New Tampa Hwy 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR GSP Clearwater 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Technigraph Corporation 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMERICAN PROCESS LETTERING, INC 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Agro-Jal Farming Enterprises 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE MTD Farms 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marc Pura Ranch, LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Costa Farms 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bella Vista Transitional Care Center 8,119 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Men's Colony - San Luis Obispo 1,599 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Men's Colony 1,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 279 946 FTE
NAT-TCR Colors For Plastics EG 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Brenmar 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hinkle Roofing Products, INC 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Maverick Arms, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gardner Cold Storage 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Residence Inn Tampa Westshore FL 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Homewood Suites Gainesville FL 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE SpringHill Suites Ft Myers FL 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.