Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) · North Carolina

JCI - Harnett

Erwin, NC · ~27 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

JCI - Harnett runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) workplace, earning a grade A.

JCI - Harnett: 1.9 TCR = 49% of Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

JCI - Harnett safety composite

JCI - Harnett scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.4

2016→2024

JCI - Harnett injury rate improved

JCI - Harnett's TCR fell 6.4 from 6.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.4 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=5.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · Erwin, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.9 · 49% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/38
  • PHOTO Oelwein Mission Serv…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oelwein Mission Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

JCI - Harnett in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows JCI - Harnett averages 1.9 TCR (49% of the Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

JCI - Harnett TCR series: 2016=6.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=5.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where JCI - Harnett falls in its industry

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation or h establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 38 Vocational rehabilitation or h employers in North Carolina.

JCI - Harnett (27 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate JCI - Harnett
JCI - Harnett (27 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

JCI - Harnett has fewer employees than the Vocational rehabilitation or habilitatio median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.7 5.7 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.5 4.5 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 6.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · NC · Erwin

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 6 employers in Erwin, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oelwein Mission Services 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Altus Air Force Base 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Workforce Escarosa, Inc - 9th Avenue - Career Center 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beachwood AAC 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bissette Farms, Inc 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hyde County Pullet Farm 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hyde County Pullet 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Price Logging Inc 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1237 344 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1237 339 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1777 LOWE S OF ERWIN NC 144 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2807-1777 143 FTE
NAT-TCR The Albert M. Higley Co. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Contractors Rental Corp. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Oelwein Mission Services 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Snedden Drive 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Industrial Welding and Tool Supply LTD. (Oklahoma City) 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Franklin Logging, Inc. 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gilbank Construction, Inc. 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Garreco Heber Springs 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.