Cattle feeds, supplements, concentrates, and premixes, manufacturing · Nebraska

J.D. Heiskell & Co. Elkhorn NE

Omaha, NE · ~51 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

J.D. Heiskell & Co. Elkhorn NE runs at 14% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Cattle feeds, supplements, concentrates, and premixes, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

J.D. Heiskell & Co. Elkhorn NE: 0.5 TCR = 14% of Cattle feeds, supplements, concentrates, and premixes, manufacturing BLS 3.9 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

J.D. Heiskell & Co. Elkhorn NE safety composite

J.D. Heiskell & Co. Elkhorn NE scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2021→2024

J.D. Heiskell & Co. Elkhorn NE injury rate improved

J.D. Heiskell & Co. Elkhorn NE's TCR fell 2.1 from 2.1 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=2.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311119 · Omaha, NE AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 14% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/18
  • PHOTO Hanby Farms Inc
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hanby Farms Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

J.D. Heiskell & Co. Elkhorn NE in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows J.D. Heiskell & Co. Elkhorn NE averages 0.5 TCR (14% of the Cattle feeds, supplements, concentrates, and premixes, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

J.D. Heiskell & Co. Elkhorn NE TCR series: 2021=2.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.9

Where J.D. Heiskell & Co. Elkhorn NE falls in its industry

756 Cattle feeds, supplements, con establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 18 Cattle feeds, supplements, con employers in Nebraska.

J.D. Heiskell & Co. Elkhorn NE (51 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate J.D. Heiskell & Co. Elkhorn NE
J.D. Heiskell & Co. Elkhorn NE (51 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 3.5

J.D. Heiskell & Co. Elkhorn NE has more employees than the Cattle feeds, supplements, concentrates, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.1 2.1 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311119 · NE · Omaha

756 Cattle feeds, supplements, concentrates, and premixes, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 1,135 employers in Omaha, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hanby Farms Inc 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR C.M. Caraway & Sons, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ridley Feed Ingredients 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR J.D. Heiskell & Co. Elkhorn NE 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE C000-ON Site 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE C000 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nebraska Hendrix-ISA, LLC 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE M&M Steel Erection Inc 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Drivers Management LLC/Over the Road Drivers 9,373 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nebraska Medicine 8,728 FTE
CITY-NEAR FUSION MEDICAL STAFFING, LLC 2,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR 61830001 METHODIST HOSPITAL 2,861 FTE
NAT-TCR Perini Management Services, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Evergreen Industrial Services - Corpus Christi 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR TCCo-OH 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Dekoron Unitherm LLC 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Drug Plastics and Glass Co., Inc. - Valley City, ND 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE 035-SGF 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE RheTech Colors 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Great Falls 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.