Automobile dealers, new only or new and used · Minnesota

Jeff Belzer's Todd Chevrolet

Lakeville, MN · ~200 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jeff Belzer's Todd Chevrolet runs at 136% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Automobile dealers, new only or new and used workplace, earning a grade D.

Jeff Belzer's Todd Chevrolet: 4.6 TCR = 136% of Automobile dealers, new only or new and used BLS 3.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jeff Belzer's Todd Chevrolet safety composite

Jeff Belzer's Todd Chevrolet scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.0

2017→2024

Jeff Belzer's Todd Chevrolet injury rate improved

Jeff Belzer's Todd Chevrolet's TCR fell 5.0 from 7.3 in 2017 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.3 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=6.0 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 441110 · Lakeville, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 136% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #145/240
  • PHOTO Crews Chevrolet
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 66 inj
  • SIZE ~200 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Crews Chevrolet (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Jeff Belzer's Todd Chevrolet in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jeff Belzer's Todd Chevrolet averages 4.6 TCR (136% of the Automobile dealers, new only or new and used BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jeff Belzer's Todd Chevrolet TCR series: 2017=7.3 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=6 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 3.4

Where Jeff Belzer's Todd Chevrolet falls in its industry

2,847 Automobile dealers, new only o establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #145 safest of 240 Automobile dealers, new only o employers in Minnesota.

Jeff Belzer's Todd Chevrolet (200 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Jeff Belzer's Todd Chevrolet
Jeff Belzer's Todd Chevrolet (200 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Jeff Belzer's Todd Chevrolet has more employees than the Automobile dealers, new only or new and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 1.2 3 1 0
2023 4.6 1.7 8 0 0
2022 6.0 3.0 10 0 0
2021 4.4 2.8 8 0 0
2020 3.8 2.7 7 0 0
2019 5.1 3.1 10 0 0
2018 3.3 0.0 6 0 0
2017 7.3 5.7 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

441110 · MN · Lakeville

2,847 Automobile dealers, new only or new and used employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 141 employers in Lakeville, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Crews Chevrolet 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lithia Kia of Anchorage 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2939 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR RUSS DARROW NISSAN OF WEST BEND LLC 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rice Lake Construction Group 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE MMD Medical 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE Motion Systems : New Hope 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cinch Connectivity Solutions 200 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeville Technical Center 645 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schmitty & Sons 640 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hearthside Foods Solutions 634 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1484 - Lakeville 414 FTE
NAT-TCR East Hartford CT Yard 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Boyd Ready Mix, Inc. 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR GoGreen Roofing Corporation 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Production Unlimited 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE KIK Underground, LLC 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE S04771 - Reno Disposal Co 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE LAFAYETTE 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE HH-GAINSCC 200 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.