Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing · Connecticut

Jeffco Fibres Woodstock

Woodstock, CT · ~110 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jeffco Fibres Woodstock runs at 343% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Jeffco Fibres Woodstock: 11.3 TCR = 343% of Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jeffco Fibres Woodstock safety composite

Jeffco Fibres Woodstock scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Jeffco Fibres Woodstock: 8.9 → 12.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 12.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.13× in 2024

Jeffco Fibres Woodstock's TCR rose 3.9 from 8.9 in 2022 to 12.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 337910 · Woodstock, CT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.3 · 343% of ind

  • DART 12.8 DART
  • RANK #5/6
  • PHOTO Serta Simmons Beddin…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 33 inj
  • SIZE ~110 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Serta Simmons Bedding Denver (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Jeffco Fibres Woodstock in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jeffco Fibres Woodstock averages 11.3 TCR (343% of the Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jeffco Fibres Woodstock TCR series: 2022=8.9 · 2023=12.2 · 2024=12.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Jeffco Fibres Woodstock falls in its industry

160 Mattresses (i.e., box spring, establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 6 Mattresses (i.e., box spring, employers in Connecticut.

Jeffco Fibres Woodstock (110 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Jeffco Fibres Woodstock
Jeffco Fibres Woodstock (110 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Jeffco Fibres Woodstock has more employees than the Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innersprin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.8 12.8 14 0 0
2023 12.2 10.0 11 0 0
2022 8.9 7.8 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

337910 · CT · Woodstock

160 Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 12 employers in Woodstock, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Serta Simmons Bedding Denver 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR E.S. Kluft & Company 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Original Mattress Factory - Maplewood Factory 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Solstice Sleep Products-Mt. Pocono 10.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Division #24 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lyman Products 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bausch Advanced Tech 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE TRIUMPH Systems, Electronics, and Controls 110 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crabtree & Evelyn, Ltd Retail Stores 782 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rogers Corporation EMS-Woodstock 130 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rogers Corporation EMS-W 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jeffco Fibres Inc. 104 FTE
NAT-TCR City of Saco Public Works Department 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Van Buren Plant 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Shelter Systems Truss Plant 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DDE8 11.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Farm and Fleet of Sycamore 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE PotlatchDeltic Land & Lumber LLC 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Broussard 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE E3 Omi 110 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.