Anesthesiologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · New York

Jefferson Anesthesiologist Services, PC

Watertown, NY · ~23 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jefferson Anesthesiologist Services, PC runs at 229% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Anesthesiologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade F.

Jefferson Anesthesiologist Services, PC: 8.7 TCR = 229% of Anesthesiologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jefferson Anesthesiologist Services, PC safety composite

Jefferson Anesthesiologist Services, PC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Jefferson Anesthesiologist Services, PC held a steady TCR band

Jefferson Anesthesiologist Services, PC's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 34.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=34.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Watertown, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.7 · 229% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #189/197
  • PHOTO Family Medicine East
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Family Medicine East (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Jefferson Anesthesiologist Services, PC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jefferson Anesthesiologist Services, PC averages 8.7 TCR (229% of the Anesthesiologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jefferson Anesthesiologist Services, PC TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=34.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Jefferson Anesthesiologist Services, PC falls in its industry

2,836 Anesthesiologists' offices (e. establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #189 safest of 197 Anesthesiologists' offices (e. employers in New York.

Jefferson Anesthesiologist Services, PC (23 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Jefferson Anesthesiologist Services, PC
Jefferson Anesthesiologist Services, PC (23 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Jefferson Anesthesiologist Services, PC has fewer employees than the Anesthesiologists' offices (e.g., center median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 34.8 0.0 0 2 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · NY · Watertown

2,836 Anesthesiologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 115 employers in Watertown, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Family Medicine East 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Norton King's Daughters' Health Downtown Medical Building 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allina Health Brooklyn Park Clinic 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Centracare St. Joeseph Clinic 8.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Singer Farms LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sheland Farms LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE McKnight's River Breeze Farm, LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stein Farms LLC 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Samaritan Medical Center 1,735 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Arc Jefferson-St Lawrence NY 1,264 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAR-FRESHNER Corporation 430 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1871 381 FTE
NAT-TCR Northern Contours Mesa-RTF 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-Swy 0025 1502 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR IN 720 Taylor Street 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Estes Park - Resort 8.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Twf Dallas 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE PEP : CPP - Rhode Island 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE JR Simplot Company-SGS Jerome-Hazelton 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE JR Simplot Company-SGS Madera 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.