Jails (except private operation of) · Illinois

Jerome Combs Detention Center

Kankakee, IL · ~144 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.6
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jerome Combs Detention Center runs at 267% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Jails (except private operation of) workplace, earning a grade F.

Jerome Combs Detention Center: 8.6 TCR = 267% of Jails (except private operation of) BLS 3.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jerome Combs Detention Center safety composite

Jerome Combs Detention Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2019→2024

Jerome Combs Detention Center injury rate improved

Jerome Combs Detention Center's TCR fell 2.5 from 10.3 in 2019 to 7.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 10.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=10.3 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=10.8 · 2022=8.7 · 2023=9.5 · 2024=7.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922140 · Kankakee, IL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.6 · 267% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #11/17
  • PHOTO Fort Dodge Correctio…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 70 inj
  • SIZE ~144 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fort Dodge Correctional Facility (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Jerome Combs Detention Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jerome Combs Detention Center averages 8.6 TCR (267% of the Jails (except private operation of) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jerome Combs Detention Center TCR series: 2019=10.3 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=10.8 · 2022=8.7 · 2023=9.5 · 2024=7.8 · BLS 3.2

Where Jerome Combs Detention Center falls in its industry

482 Jails (except private operatio establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 17 Jails (except private operatio employers in Illinois.

Jerome Combs Detention Center (144 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Jerome Combs Detention Center
Jerome Combs Detention Center (144 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Jerome Combs Detention Center has fewer employees than the Jails (except private operation of) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.8 1.3 9 3 0
2023 9.5 4.4 15 0 0
2022 8.7 2.0 11 2 0
2021 10.8 6.0 16 0 0
2020 4.3 1.9 5 2 0
2019 10.3 5.7 14 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922140 · IL · Kankakee

482 Jails (except private operation of) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 105 employers in Kankakee, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fort Dodge Correctional Facility 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lawrence Correctional Center 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ionia Correctional Facility 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR State of California - 048 8.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Muller Pinehurst Dairy Inc 144 FTE
STATE-SIZE Norman Mechanical Inc 144 FTE
STATE-SIZE A&R Mechanical Contractors 144 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Suter Company, Inc. (May) 144 FTE
CITY-NEAR RIVERSIDE HEALTH SYSTEM - 7240724 3,145 FTE
CITY-NEAR RIVERSIDE MEDICAL CENTER 2,562 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kankakee SD #111 859 FTE
CITY-NEAR Presence St. Mary's Hospital Kankakee 726 FTE
NAT-TCR HNN Associates LLC 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 2631 - Crofton 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 2322 - Mentor 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunset 8.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Potomac Abatement LLC. 144 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maple Donuts Erie, LLC 144 FTE
NAT-SIZE H2 Precast Inc 144 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2433 - Lisbon 144 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.