Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential · Pennsylvania

Jessica and Friends Community

York, PA · ~93 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jessica and Friends Community runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential workplace, earning a grade A.

Jessica and Friends Community: 1.1 TCR = 28% of Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jessica and Friends Community safety composite

Jessica and Friends Community scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2016→2017

Jessica and Friends Community injury rate improved

Jessica and Friends Community's TCR fell 2.1 from 2.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.1 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.1 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · York, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/121
  • PHOTO Clewiston ADR
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~93 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Clewiston ADR (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Jessica and Friends Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jessica and Friends Community averages 1.1 TCR (28% of the Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jessica and Friends Community TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2017=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Jessica and Friends Community falls in its industry

2,261 Intellectual and developmental establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 121 Intellectual and developmental employers in Pennsylvania.

Jessica and Friends Community (93 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Jessica and Friends Community
Jessica and Friends Community (93 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Jessica and Friends Community has more employees than the Intellectual and developmental disabilit median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · PA · York

2,261 Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 496 employers in York, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Clewiston ADR 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR GCS, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR IO - Lexington 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Creative Community Living Services Eastern Metro 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Holistic Farms LLC 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hunter Roberts Construction Group- PA 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Duda Cable Construction Inc. 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE A. Liberoni Inc 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR WellSpan York Hospital 4,886 FTE
CITY-NEAR WellSpan Medical Group 4,293 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wellspan Health 2,591 FTE
CITY-NEAR FedEx Supply Chain (Target York) 1,875 FTE
NAT-TCR AmeriGas - ACE - Pahrump, NV 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR G5 - Gateway 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Monitor Manufacturing - Augusta 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Salt-Tampa 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE N and R of Greene Haven LLC 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forsyth Manor Inc 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant 242 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Homestead Center 93 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.