Social service centers, multipurpose · New Jersey

Jewish Federation of Southern New Jersey

Cherry Hill, NJ · ~737 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jewish Federation of Southern New Jersey runs at 159% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Social service centers, multipurpose workplace, earning a grade D.

Jewish Federation of Southern New Jersey: 6.1 TCR = 159% of Social service centers, multipurpose BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jewish Federation of Southern New Jersey safety composite

Jewish Federation of Southern New Jersey scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2022→2024

Jewish Federation of Southern New Jersey injury rate improved

Jewish Federation of Southern New Jersey's TCR fell 2.5 from 7.0 in 2022 to 4.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=7.0 · 2023=6.7 · 2024=4.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624190 · Cherry Hill, NJ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.1 · 159% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #7/10
  • PHOTO Merrimack Valley
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 60 inj
  • SIZE ~737 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Merrimack Valley (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Jewish Federation of Southern New Jersey in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jewish Federation of Southern New Jersey averages 6.1 TCR (159% of the Social service centers, multipurpose BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jewish Federation of Southern New Jersey TCR series: 2022=7 · 2023=6.7 · 2024=4.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Jewish Federation of Southern New Jersey falls in its industry

990 Social service centers, multip establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 10 Social service centers, multip employers in New Jersey.

Jewish Federation of Southern New Jersey (737 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Jewish Federation of Southern New Jersey
Jewish Federation of Southern New Jersey (737 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Jewish Federation of Southern New Jersey has more employees than the Social service centers, multipurpose median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.5 2.4 17 0 0
2023 6.7 5.6 23 1 0
2022 7.0 4.1 20 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624190 · NJ · Cherry Hill

990 Social service centers, multipurpose employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 145 employers in Cherry Hill, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Merrimack Valley 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Options MN - River Ridge, LLC Burnsville 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR YMCA of Memphis - Olive Branch 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Headquarters 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6458-ZSEC 737 FTE
STATE-SIZE PRMSNJ60 737 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6164-ST JOSEPH S WAYNE HOSPITAL 737 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seabrook Village 736 FTE
CITY-NEAR Protocall NJ, Inc. NJ HC 2,465 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riggs Distler & Company Inc 1,392 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jefferson Hospital Cherry Hill 1,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jefferson Health NJ Cherry Hill - Formerly Kennedy Health 1,030 FTE
NAT-TCR BTC El Paso 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Elizabethton 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Dry Creek 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR EFC Systems, Inc. 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE C02 737 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rush Foundation Hospital 737 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Motors Marion Stamping 737 FTE
NAT-SIZE High Desert Education Services 737 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.