Air purification equipment, stationary, manufacturing · Texas

JF Filtration, Inc. dba Joe W. Fly Company

Dallas, TX · ~122 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

JF Filtration, Inc. dba Joe W. Fly Company runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Air purification equipment, stationary, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

JF Filtration, Inc. dba Joe W. Fly Company: 1.2 TCR = 38% of Air purification equipment, stationary, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

JF Filtration, Inc. dba Joe W. Fly Company safety composite

JF Filtration, Inc. dba Joe W. Fly Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2017→2018

JF Filtration, Inc. dba Joe W. Fly Company injury rate improved

JF Filtration, Inc. dba Joe W. Fly Company's TCR fell 0.8 from 1.6 in 2017 to 0.8 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.6 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.6 · 2018=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333413 · Dallas, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 38% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/26
  • PHOTO Universal Air Filter
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~122 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Universal Air Filter (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

JF Filtration, Inc. dba Joe W. Fly Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows JF Filtration, Inc. dba Joe W. Fly Company averages 1.2 TCR (38% of the Air purification equipment, stationary, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

JF Filtration, Inc. dba Joe W. Fly Company TCR series: 2017=1.6 · 2018=0.8 · BLS 3.3

Where JF Filtration, Inc. dba Joe W. Fly Company falls in its industry

232 Air purification equipment, st establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 26 Air purification equipment, st employers in Texas.

JF Filtration, Inc. dba Joe W. Fly Company (122 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate JF Filtration, Inc. dba Joe W. Fly Company
JF Filtration, Inc. dba Joe W. Fly Company (122 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.1

JF Filtration, Inc. dba Joe W. Fly Company has more employees than the Air purification equipment, stationary, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 1.6 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333413 · TX · Dallas

232 Air purification equipment, stationary, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Universal Air Filter 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR BOFA Americas, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR KooltronicPennington 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR DCM Manufacturing - Texas 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Iron Horse Tools, Inc. 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Benito SC 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lubbock Operations Center-119 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amarillo Technical Center-122 122 FTE
CITY-NEAR AECOM DCS (US Operations) 15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rexel USA, Inc 8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQ - Headquarters 5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR WSW 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR I3 - Lake Grove 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR East Bay District Office (Caokn) 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Midwest Foods 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Peapod S&S North Reading, Ma 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southeast Louisiana Home Health 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fort Wayne Magnet Wire Plant 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manassas Health & Rehab Center 122 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.