Paper or pulp mill construction · California

JFSNA at New Indy Container Board

Ontario, CA · ~57 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

JFSNA at New Indy Container Board runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Paper or pulp mill construction workplace, earning a grade A.

JFSNA at New Indy Container Board: 0.8 TCR = 29% of Paper or pulp mill construction BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

JFSNA at New Indy Container Board safety composite

JFSNA at New Indy Container Board scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

JFSNA at New Indy Container Board: 0.0 → 1.7 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 1.7 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2018

JFSNA at New Indy Container Board's TCR rose 1.7 from 0.0 in 2017 to 1.7 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Ontario, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 29% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #11/78
  • PHOTO GEM Industrial Inc. …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GEM Industrial Inc. - First Solar Plant 2 (PG-2) and Plant 3 (PG-3) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

JFSNA at New Indy Container Board in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows JFSNA at New Indy Container Board averages 0.8 TCR (29% of the Paper or pulp mill construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

JFSNA at New Indy Container Board TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=1.7 · BLS 2.9

Where JFSNA at New Indy Container Board falls in its industry

924 Paper or pulp mill constructio establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 78 Paper or pulp mill constructio employers in California.

JFSNA at New Indy Container Board (57 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate JFSNA at New Indy Container Board
JFSNA at New Indy Container Board (57 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

JFSNA at New Indy Container Board has fewer employees than the Paper or pulp mill construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · CA · Ontario

924 Paper or pulp mill construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 599 employers in Ontario, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GEM Industrial Inc. - First Solar Plant 2 (PG-2) and Plant 3 (PG-3) 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR GEM Industrial Inc. - Walbridge 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mundy Maintenance, Services and Operations LLC Job #32328 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Herrero Builders 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bowles Farming Company 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blanc Vineyards, LLC 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE MI RANCHITO FARMING INC 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farmland Management Services 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime Healthcare Services Inc. Location: St. Mary's, Passaic LLC 46-3499370 (HP29) 10,997 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAONA - ONTARIO HUB 4,372 FTE
CITY-NEAR ONTARIO HUB (CAONA) 3,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atlantic Solutions Group Inc, Inc. DBA Empire Workforce Solutions 3,240 FTE
NAT-TCR Cranbury 1 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR II-VI OED Warren 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Continental Industries Tulsa 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Pitt Plastics Pittsburg 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE New Athens Home for the Aged 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baillie Lumber Booneville Sawmill 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Shale Piney Flats 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4113-41131003-R19 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.