Metal scrap and waste merchant wholesalers · Louisiana

Ji&M General Scrap

Shreveport, LA · ~20 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ji&M General Scrap runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Metal scrap and waste merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade B.

Ji&M General Scrap: 1.5 TCR = 70% of Metal scrap and waste merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ji&M General Scrap safety composite

Ji&M General Scrap scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Ji&M General Scrap held a steady TCR band

Ji&M General Scrap's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423930 · Shreveport, LA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.5 · 70% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/18
  • PHOTO Everett
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Everett (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

Ji&M General Scrap in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ji&M General Scrap averages 1.5 TCR (70% of the Metal scrap and waste merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ji&M General Scrap TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Ji&M General Scrap falls in its industry

1,126 Metal scrap and waste merchant establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 18 Metal scrap and waste merchant employers in Louisiana.

Ji&M General Scrap (20 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Ji&M General Scrap
Ji&M General Scrap (20 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Ji&M General Scrap has fewer employees than the Metal scrap and waste merchant wholesale median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.6 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.4 4.4 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.8 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423930 · LA · Shreveport

1,126 Metal scrap and waste merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 403 employers in Shreveport, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Everett 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reserve FTL, dba Reserve Iron Ohio 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR PnP Tacoma 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pratt Recycling Gary,IN. 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Plaq Frac Plant 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gulf Island Services - PWE 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Entergy Lockport 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Entergy Terrebonne 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Willis-Knighton Medical Center 3,163 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNIVERSITY HEALTH SHEREVPORT, LLC d/b/a OCHSNER LSU HEALTH SHREVEPORT 2,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Shreveport 2,424 FTE
CITY-NEAR Willis-Knighton Pierremont Health Center 1,567 FTE
NAT-TCR Market of Choice #88 / Corporate Office 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Portland Hampton Inn & Suites 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Building Integrated Services, LLC 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Daewon America #3 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vista Steel Company 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Overland Park Residence Inn 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brandon Hospitality 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hilltop Hospitality Group 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.