Tracked vehicle freight transportation, long-distance · Wisconsin

Jim Piontek Trucking Inc

Green Bay, WI · ~36 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jim Piontek Trucking Inc runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Tracked vehicle freight transportation, long-distance workplace, earning a grade A.

Jim Piontek Trucking Inc: 1.0 TCR = 22% of Tracked vehicle freight transportation, long-distance BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jim Piontek Trucking Inc safety composite

Jim Piontek Trucking Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2016→2024

Jim Piontek Trucking Inc injury rate improved

Jim Piontek Trucking Inc's TCR fell 3.0 from 3.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.0 · 2017=2.7 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484230 · Green Bay, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/26
  • PHOTO Clean Harbors Enviro…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 10MWR (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Jim Piontek Trucking Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jim Piontek Trucking Inc averages 1.0 TCR (22% of the Tracked vehicle freight transportation, long-distance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jim Piontek Trucking Inc TCR series: 2016=3 · 2017=2.7 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Jim Piontek Trucking Inc falls in its industry

1,026 Tracked vehicle freight transp establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 26 Tracked vehicle freight transp employers in Wisconsin.

Jim Piontek Trucking Inc (36 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Jim Piontek Trucking Inc
Jim Piontek Trucking Inc (36 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Jim Piontek Trucking Inc has fewer employees than the Tracked vehicle freight transportation, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.1 0.0 1 0 1
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.7 0.0 1 0 0
2016 3.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484230 · WI · Green Bay

1,026 Tracked vehicle freight transportation, long-distance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 563 employers in Green Bay, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 10MWR 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR TMC Transportation - Sweetwater Georgia Pacific 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR TX-MID 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Robbie D. Wood, Inc. 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rolling Hills Diary Farm, LLC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE T & T Quality Cutting LLC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wisconsin Valley Improvement Company 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barron Electric Cooperative 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI005 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,595 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,296 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital Campus 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR 300000170855522 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 2,379 FTE
NAT-TCR Warehouse 3 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sharpe Interior Systems, Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Clorox Mfg 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR iCare Health Management, LLC 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pine Ridge Alz 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE MWI, Inc 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spindale 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE AZZ Surface Technologies - Terrell LLC 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.