Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel · Mississippi

Jindal Tubular USA LLC

Bay St. Louis, MS · ~276 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jindal Tubular USA LLC runs at 110% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel workplace, earning a grade C.

Jindal Tubular USA LLC: 3.6 TCR = 110% of Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jindal Tubular USA LLC safety composite

Jindal Tubular USA LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2022→2023

Jindal Tubular USA LLC injury rate improved

Jindal Tubular USA LLC's TCR fell 0.6 from 4.0 in 2022 to 3.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=4.0 · 2023=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331210 · Bay St. Louis, MS ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 110% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #6/9
  • PHOTO Alphi Manufacturing,…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~276 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Alphi Manufacturing, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Jindal Tubular USA LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jindal Tubular USA LLC averages 3.6 TCR (110% of the Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jindal Tubular USA LLC TCR series: 2022=4 · 2023=3.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Jindal Tubular USA LLC falls in its industry

329 Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, loc establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 9 Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, loc employers in Mississippi.

Jindal Tubular USA LLC (276 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Jindal Tubular USA LLC
Jindal Tubular USA LLC (276 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Jindal Tubular USA LLC has more employees than the Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, s median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.3 1.4 16 0 0
2022 4.0 2.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331210 · MS · Bay St. Louis

329 Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 12 employers in Bay St. Louis, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Alphi Manufacturing, LLC 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR TN Michigan, LLC 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bull Moose Tube Masury 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Webco Texas Distribution 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hood Industries Inc. Wiggins 276 FTE
STATE-SIZE Supply Chain Batesville MS 276 FTE
STATE-SIZE 025-00478 275 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5419 277 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hollywood Casino Gulf Coast 547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Silver Slipper Casino Venture LLC 539 FTE
CITY-NEAR DAK Americas Mississippi Inc 162 FTE
CITY-NEAR SABIC Bay St. Louis Facility 98 FTE
NAT-TCR Murray Elementary School 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #1475 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR L&M Warehouse & Packing of North Florida LLC 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hussmann Services Corporation- Powder Springs 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sysco Hawaii Inc 276 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Long Beach Memorial Med Center 276 FTE
NAT-SIZE Casino Fandango 276 FTE
NAT-SIZE Klein Tools, Inc 276 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.