Punches for use with machine tools manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Jit Tool & Die, Inc

Brockport, PA · ~39 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jit Tool & Die, Inc runs at 132% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Punches for use with machine tools manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Jit Tool & Die, Inc: 4.4 TCR = 132% of Punches for use with machine tools manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jit Tool & Die, Inc safety composite

Jit Tool & Die, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Jit Tool & Die, Inc held a steady TCR band

Jit Tool & Die, Inc's TCR held near 0.1 from 5.3 in 2017 to 5.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 13.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.3 · 2018=13.3 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=5.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333514 · Brockport, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 132% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #28/39
  • PHOTO Plant 1 Washington
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Plant 1 Washington (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Jit Tool & Die, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jit Tool & Die, Inc averages 4.4 TCR (132% of the Punches for use with machine tools manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jit Tool & Die, Inc TCR series: 2017=5.3 · 2018=13.3 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=3 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=5.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Jit Tool & Die, Inc falls in its industry

387 Punches for use with machine t establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 39 Punches for use with machine t employers in Pennsylvania.

Jit Tool & Die, Inc (39 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Jit Tool & Die, Inc
Jit Tool & Die, Inc (39 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Jit Tool & Die, Inc has fewer employees than the Punches for use with machine tools manuf median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.3 0.0 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2021 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.3 0.0 2 0 0
2018 13.3 0.0 5 0 0
2017 5.3 2.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333514 · PA · Brockport

387 Punches for use with machine tools manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 6 employers in Brockport, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Plant 1 Washington 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Paslin - Hoover 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR AD Ithaca 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR ArtiFlex Manufacturing Broadway Campus 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sylvan PA 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monterey Mushrooms, LLC.- Temple, PA 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boyer Nurseries & Orchards, Inc. 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Creek Nurseries, Inc. (Shipping) 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Plant 19. 307 FTE
CITY-NEAR Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Crenshaw Plant 19 307 FTE
CITY-NEAR Owens-Brockway Glass Container - Crenshaw Plant 19 306 FTE
CITY-NEAR Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Plant 76 33 FTE
NAT-TCR Devro, Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR North Star Ranch Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Etowah Health Care Center 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bar Processing Corporation 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE D.W. Mack Co., Inc. 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carson Terminal 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ag Processing Inc. Manning 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cedar Grove Assisted Living 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.