Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, cold-drawn stainless steel, made from purchased steel · Michigan

J&L Manufacturing

Marshall, MI · ~51 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

J&L Manufacturing runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, cold-drawn stainless steel, made from purchased steel workplace, earning a grade B.

J&L Manufacturing: 2.1 TCR = 62% of Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, cold-drawn stainless steel, made from purchased steel BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

J&L Manufacturing safety composite

J&L Manufacturing scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

J&L Manufacturing: 0.0 → 4.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

J&L Manufacturing's TCR rose 4.2 from 0.0 in 2019 to 4.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331210 · Marshall, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 62% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/16
  • PHOTO Nucor Tubular Produc…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nucor Tubular Products - Marseilles (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

J&L Manufacturing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows J&L Manufacturing averages 2.1 TCR (62% of the Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, cold-drawn stainless steel, made from purchased steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

J&L Manufacturing TCR series: 2019=0 · 2021=0 · 2023=4 · 2024=4.2 · BLS 3.3

Where J&L Manufacturing falls in its industry

329 Tubing, mechanical and hypoder establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 16 Tubing, mechanical and hypoder employers in Michigan.

J&L Manufacturing (51 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate J&L Manufacturing
J&L Manufacturing (51 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3

J&L Manufacturing has fewer employees than the Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.2 0.0 2 0 0
2023 4.0 2.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331210 · MI · Marshall

329 Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, cold-drawn stainless steel, made from purchased steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 39 employers in Marshall, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nucor Tubular Products - Marseilles 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nucor Tubular Product Inc. Decatur 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Taylor Forge Engineered Systems Greeley 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beaver Falls Tubular Products LLC, Beaver Falls Plant 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jack Pine Farms, LLC 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bay County Waste Water Treatment Plant 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Turner Electric Service, Inc. 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hillsdale County Road Commission 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oaklawn 1,104 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tenneco, Inc. 703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Common Citizen 380 FTE
CITY-NEAR headquarters 203 FTE
NAT-TCR Gator Tampa 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Zotefoams Inc 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Glue Dots International 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Morgan Truck Body LLC MAZ 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Engineering Victorville CA 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Services OWS Dallas 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Commercial Asphalt 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houghton Corporation 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.