Metals service centers · Tennessee

JMS Russel Metals Corp - Jackson

Jackson, TN · ~50 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

JMS Russel Metals Corp - Jackson runs at 146% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Metals service centers workplace, earning a grade D.

JMS Russel Metals Corp - Jackson: 3.2 TCR = 146% of Metals service centers BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

JMS Russel Metals Corp - Jackson safety composite

JMS Russel Metals Corp - Jackson scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.2

2016→2024

JMS Russel Metals Corp - Jackson injury rate improved

JMS Russel Metals Corp - Jackson's TCR fell 7.2 from 7.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.2 · 2017=6.9 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423510 · Jackson, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.2 · 146% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/32
  • PHOTO Feralloy Charleston …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Feralloy Charleston Division Loc'n # 331 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

JMS Russel Metals Corp - Jackson in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows JMS Russel Metals Corp - Jackson averages 3.2 TCR (146% of the Metals service centers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

JMS Russel Metals Corp - Jackson TCR series: 2016=7.2 · 2017=6.9 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where JMS Russel Metals Corp - Jackson falls in its industry

1,299 Metals service centers establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 32 Metals service centers employers in Tennessee.

JMS Russel Metals Corp - Jackson (50 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate JMS Russel Metals Corp - Jackson
JMS Russel Metals Corp - Jackson (50 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.7

JMS Russel Metals Corp - Jackson has more employees than the Metals service centers median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2022 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2021 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.5 1.7 2 0 0
2018 4.5 1.5 3 0 0
2017 6.9 3.4 4 0 0
2016 7.2 1.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423510 · TN · Jackson

1,299 Metals service centers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 233 employers in Jackson, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Feralloy Charleston Division Loc'n # 331 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reliance Metal Center 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crest Steel Corporation 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ryerson - Southern Tool Steel - Chattanooga 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Memphis Greenhouse 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Winchester Utility System 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE W. R. Newman & Associates, Inc. 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE P&C Construction 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR JACKSON MADISON COUNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL 4,844 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jackson Manufacturing Facility - KNA 1,210 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Faucet Company of Tennessee 1,125 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Jackson 1,046 FTE
NAT-TCR Ghilotti Construction Company, Inc 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 1257 Elko Drive 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR KYTC District 7 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR CX2 Construction, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hampton Downtown 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hilton Wayne 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orenco Systems, Inc. - Winchester Facility 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE IHG Army Hotels - Fort Bliss (Holiday Inn Express/Army Lodging 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.