Metals service centers · Arkansas

JMS Russel Metals Corp - Jonesboro

Jonesboro, AR · ~51 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

JMS Russel Metals Corp - Jonesboro runs at 305% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Metals service centers workplace, earning a grade F.

JMS Russel Metals Corp - Jonesboro: 6.7 TCR = 305% of Metals service centers BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

JMS Russel Metals Corp - Jonesboro safety composite

JMS Russel Metals Corp - Jonesboro scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.3

2016→2024

JMS Russel Metals Corp - Jonesboro injury rate improved

JMS Russel Metals Corp - Jonesboro's TCR fell 14.3 from 14.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 17.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.3 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=7.3 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=12.6 · 2022=17.8 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423510 · Jonesboro, AR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.7 · 305% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/18
  • PHOTO York Mac YRK
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: York Mac YRK (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

JMS Russel Metals Corp - Jonesboro in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows JMS Russel Metals Corp - Jonesboro averages 6.7 TCR (305% of the Metals service centers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

JMS Russel Metals Corp - Jonesboro TCR series: 2016=14.3 · 2017=0 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=7.3 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=12.6 · 2022=17.8 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where JMS Russel Metals Corp - Jonesboro falls in its industry

1,299 Metals service centers establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 18 Metals service centers employers in Arkansas.

JMS Russel Metals Corp - Jonesboro (51 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate JMS Russel Metals Corp - Jonesboro
JMS Russel Metals Corp - Jonesboro (51 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.7

JMS Russel Metals Corp - Jonesboro has more employees than the Metals service centers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.6 0.0 2 0 0
2022 17.8 15.5 8 0 0
2021 12.6 12.6 6 0 0
2020 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2019 7.3 5.5 4 0 0
2018 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 14.3 8.2 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423510 · AR · Jonesboro

1,299 Metals service centers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 169 employers in Jonesboro, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR York Mac YRK 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ryerson - Strongville 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oregon Metal Services 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lionshead Alloys LLC 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE George's Springdale Grow Out 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cargill Poultry 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Arkansas Electric Cooperative - Mountain Home 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlas Batesville 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Bernards Medical Center 3,466 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Bernards Hospital 1,975 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hytrol Conveyor Company - Jonesboro 1,366 FTE
CITY-NEAR NEA Baptist Memorial Hospital 1,244 FTE
NAT-TCR Plant 3K 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Original Mattress Factory - Pittsburgh 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Koshkonong Facility 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Jackson - 15 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Buda 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bay County Waste Water Treatment Plant 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE KW Electric Inc. - Emmetsburg 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brite-O-Matic Manufacturing, Inc. 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.