Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing · New Jersey

John Crane Swedesboro

Swedesboro, NJ · ~61 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

John Crane Swedesboro runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

John Crane Swedesboro: 0.6 TCR = 18% of Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

John Crane Swedesboro safety composite

John Crane Swedesboro scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

John Crane Swedesboro held a steady TCR band

John Crane Swedesboro's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.9 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339991 · Swedesboro, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/7
  • PHOTO Greene Tweed and Com…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Greene Tweed and Company Houston (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

John Crane Swedesboro in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows John Crane Swedesboro averages 0.6 TCR (18% of the Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

John Crane Swedesboro TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where John Crane Swedesboro falls in its industry

218 Gasket, packing, and sealing d establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 7 Gasket, packing, and sealing d employers in New Jersey.

John Crane Swedesboro (61 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate John Crane Swedesboro
John Crane Swedesboro (61 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.3

John Crane Swedesboro has fewer employees than the Gasket, packing, and sealing devices man median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339991 · NJ · Swedesboro

218 Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 74 employers in Swedesboro, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Greene Tweed and Company Houston 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR John Crane Baton Rouge 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR John Crane Morton Grove 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Engineered Materials : Houston PSC 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jersey City 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlantic City NJ 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mike Fitzpatrick Equipment Company 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE 213-NY-New York City 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ready Pac Foods 785 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aspire Bakeries - Swedesboro 525 FTE
CITY-NEAR NJ02 - Swedesboro Fulfillment Center 497 FTE
CITY-NEAR ARYZTA - Swedesboro 490 FTE
NAT-TCR Emporia Flex Plant 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Jesse Stutts Inc 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Terik Roofing Inc 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 61-Usf-Olf Red Mill 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE John Crane Crystal Lake 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage on the Marina 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Utah Pacific bridge & Steel LTD 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bogner Construction 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.