General warehousing and storage · California

John Deere Regional Distribution Center - Lathrop

Lathrop, CA · ~38 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

John Deere Regional Distribution Center - Lathrop runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade B.

John Deere Regional Distribution Center - Lathrop: 3.7 TCR = 63% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

John Deere Regional Distribution Center - Lathrop safety composite

John Deere Regional Distribution Center - Lathrop scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.3

2022→2024

John Deere Regional Distribution Center - Lathrop injury rate improved

John Deere Regional Distribution Center - Lathrop's TCR fell 8.3 from 8.3 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 8.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=8.3 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Lathrop, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.7 · 63% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #516/1131
  • PHOTO Shaklee DC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Shaklee DC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

John Deere Regional Distribution Center - Lathrop in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows John Deere Regional Distribution Center - Lathrop averages 3.7 TCR (63% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

John Deere Regional Distribution Center - Lathrop TCR series: 2022=8.3 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where John Deere Regional Distribution Center - Lathrop falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #516 safest of 1131 General warehousing and storag employers in California.

John Deere Regional Distribution Center - Lathrop (38 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate John Deere Regional Distribution Center - Lathrop
John Deere Regional Distribution Center - Lathrop (38 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

John Deere Regional Distribution Center - Lathrop has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2022 8.3 8.3 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · CA · Lathrop

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 77 employers in Lathrop, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Shaklee DC 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 50081 - CAPSTONE UNFI Moreno Valley 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prime Now LLC - UIN1 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - MDW4 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAL-O SHIPPING 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE GAR & S Farm Labor Services, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Supreme Almonds of California, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bays Ranch Inc 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR CALAH - LATHROP HUB 1,624 FTE
CITY-NEAR LATHROP HUB (CALAH) 970 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-CA-Lathrop-Harlan Rd-Manufacturing 518 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2802_5346 516 FTE
NAT-TCR 8010516 P and G Iowa City 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR RCN Telecom Services MA, LLC- Canton 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake Norman Medical Center - EVS 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Fargo Insulation Co., Inc 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1049 - Owensboro 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grain Craft ID 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Asia Union Electronic Chemicals-Reno, Inc. 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wave Division Holdings, LLC-LaConner 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.