Commercial building construction general contractors · California

John M Frank Construction Inc

Santa Ana, CA · ~64 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

John M Frank Construction Inc runs at 136% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

John M Frank Construction Inc: 3.9 TCR = 136% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

John M Frank Construction Inc safety composite

John M Frank Construction Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

John M Frank Construction Inc: 2.6 → 7.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 7.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.77× in 2024

John M Frank Construction Inc's TCR rose 4.4 from 2.6 in 2017 to 7.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Santa Ana, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.9 · 136% of ind

  • DART 7.0 DART
  • RANK #334/486
  • PHOTO Rinderknecht Associa…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rinderknecht Associates, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

John M Frank Construction Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows John M Frank Construction Inc averages 3.9 TCR (136% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

John M Frank Construction Inc TCR series: 2017=2.6 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=5.1 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=7 · BLS 2.9

Where John M Frank Construction Inc falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #334 safest of 486 Commercial building constructi employers in California.

John M Frank Construction Inc (64 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate John M Frank Construction Inc
John M Frank Construction Inc (64 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

John M Frank Construction Inc has more employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.0 7.0 4 0 0
2023 3.4 3.4 2 0 0
2022 5.1 3.4 3 0 0
2021 3.3 3.3 2 0 0
2020 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2019 3.1 0.0 2 0 0
2018 5.2 5.2 4 0 0
2017 2.6 2.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · CA · Santa Ana

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 492 employers in Santa Ana, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rinderknecht Associates, Inc. 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Savannah Specialty Products 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Scherer Construction of North Florida 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Costa Farms, Inc. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE MDERA 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE AGS FARM LABOR CORPORATION 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arroyo Seco Vineyards, Inc 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Think Together 2,496 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Santa Ana 1,472 FTE
CITY-NEAR Orange County/Los Angeles 1,072 FTE
CITY-NEAR 056937-SANTA ANA CA P&DC 920 FTE
NAT-TCR Scott A Duncan, Inc. 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Thornton Chevrolet Inc 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Radio Systems Corporation. 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake Otis AK Yard 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Northern Technologies HQ 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1136 NW El Paso 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Steele Rubber Products Inc 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE CFFV 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.