Bedding plant growing (except vegetable and melon bedding plants) · Michigan

John Schuring, Jr. Company

Portage, MI · ~23 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

John Schuring, Jr. Company runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Bedding plant growing (except vegetable and melon bedding plants) workplace, earning a grade A.

John Schuring, Jr. Company: 1.0 TCR = 22% of Bedding plant growing (except vegetable and melon bedding plants) BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

John Schuring, Jr. Company safety composite

John Schuring, Jr. Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2016→2024

John Schuring, Jr. Company injury rate improved

John Schuring, Jr. Company's TCR fell 4.0 from 4.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111422 · Portage, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/28
  • PHOTO Young's Plant Farm, …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Young's Plant Farm, Inc. (Office) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

John Schuring, Jr. Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows John Schuring, Jr. Company averages 1.0 TCR (22% of the Bedding plant growing (except vegetable and melon bedding plants) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

John Schuring, Jr. Company TCR series: 2016=4 · 2021=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where John Schuring, Jr. Company falls in its industry

166 Bedding plant growing (except establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 28 Bedding plant growing (except employers in Michigan.

John Schuring, Jr. Company (23 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate John Schuring, Jr. Company
John Schuring, Jr. Company (23 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 5.5

John Schuring, Jr. Company has fewer employees than the Bedding plant growing (except vegetable median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111422 · MI · Portage

166 Bedding plant growing (except vegetable and melon bedding plants) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 136 employers in Portage, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Young's Plant Farm, Inc. (Office) 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fernhill Holly Farms 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dan Schantz Greenhouse (Rising Sun, MD) 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR C3 Industries, Inc - Portland 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Black Gold Farms - MIS 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Casey Woodwyk, Inc. 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atwood Timber and Lumber 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grayling Generating Station 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stryker Instruments - 1941 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stryker Medical 2,059 FTE
CITY-NEAR Summit Polymers, Inc. 1,619 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stryker Corporation Shared Services 768 FTE
NAT-TCR Thomas Industries, Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sam C Franklin & Son, Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Houston Foam Plastics 4 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Valmet Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Homewood Suites Reno 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE TownePlace Suites Ridgeland 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE MRT Partners LLC / DBA MRT 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Courtyard San Antonio 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.