Sewage treatment plant construction · North Dakota

John T. Jones Construction Co

Fargo, ND · ~64 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

John T. Jones Construction Co runs at 239% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sewage treatment plant construction workplace, earning a grade F.

John T. Jones Construction Co: 6.7 TCR = 239% of Sewage treatment plant construction BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

John T. Jones Construction Co safety composite

John T. Jones Construction Co scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2016→2024

John T. Jones Construction Co injury rate improved

John T. Jones Construction Co's TCR fell 3.2 from 9.7 in 2016 to 6.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.7 · 2017=11.3 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=0.0 · 2023=10.6 · 2024=6.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Fargo, ND ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.7 · 239% of ind

  • DART 6.4 DART
  • RANK #6/8
  • PHOTO Ortiz Corporation
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ortiz Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Dakota employers → · Look up another →

John T. Jones Construction Co in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows John T. Jones Construction Co averages 6.7 TCR (239% of the Sewage treatment plant construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

John T. Jones Construction Co TCR series: 2016=9.7 · 2017=11.3 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=0 · 2023=10.6 · 2024=6.4 · BLS 2.8

Where John T. Jones Construction Co falls in its industry

1,614 Sewage treatment plant constru establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Dakota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 8 Sewage treatment plant constru employers in North Dakota.

John T. Jones Construction Co (64 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate John T. Jones Construction Co
John T. Jones Construction Co (64 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

John T. Jones Construction Co has more employees than the Sewage treatment plant construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.4 6.4 3 0 0
2023 10.6 4.3 4 1 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.1 0.0 1 0 0
2017 11.3 3.2 7 0 0
2016 9.7 3.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · ND · Fargo

1,614 Sewage treatment plant construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,696 rated employers in North Dakota with headcount on file · 415 employers in Fargo, ND · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ortiz Corporation 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eastside WTP Basins 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR RK Davis, Inc. 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR JOSEPH W DAVIS INC 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sun Electric Inc. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE C.L. Linfoot Comapny 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bismarck - H A Thompson & Sons, Inc. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE SUPERVALU DISTRIBUTION CENTER - BISMARCK 31211 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,Fargo-Medical Center-General Medical And Surgical Hospitals 2,963 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,FARGO - North Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 2,722 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,FARGO - Fargo Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 2,568 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,Fargo-Broadway Hospital-General Medical And Surgical Hospitals 2,547 FTE
NAT-TCR Milar - Lansing Airport 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Cci-8050 LLC 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Tallahassee 10211 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Rainbow Play Systems, Inc. 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Iap Inc. 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Snug Harbor/Marine Ctr 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Subaru Telescope - NAOJ 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bravo Company USA, Inc 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.