Research and Development in the Physical Engineering and Life Sciences · California

Johnson and Johnson Vision Santa Ana

Santa Ana, CA · ~772 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Johnson and Johnson Vision Santa Ana runs at 98% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Research and Development in the Physical Engineering and Life Sciences workplace, earning a grade C.

Johnson and Johnson Vision Santa Ana: 0.5 TCR = 98% of Research and Development in the Physical Engineering and Life Sciences BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Johnson and Johnson Vision Santa Ana safety composite

Johnson and Johnson Vision Santa Ana scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Johnson and Johnson Vision Santa Ana held a steady TCR band

Johnson and Johnson Vision Santa Ana's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.4 in 2017 to 0.6 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.73× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.4 · 2018=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541711 · Santa Ana, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.5 · 98% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #11/51
  • PHOTO Supernus Pharmaceuti…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~772 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Supernus Pharmaceuticals (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Johnson and Johnson Vision Santa Ana in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Johnson and Johnson Vision Santa Ana averages 0.5 TCR (98% of the Research and Development in the Physical Engineering and Life Sciences BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Johnson and Johnson Vision Santa Ana TCR series: 2017=0.4 · 2018=0.6 · BLS 0.5

Where Johnson and Johnson Vision Santa Ana falls in its industry

189 Research and Development in th establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 51 Research and Development in th employers in California.

Johnson and Johnson Vision Santa Ana (772 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 296 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Johnson and Johnson Vision Santa Ana
Johnson and Johnson Vision Santa Ana (772 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 296 employees and a TCR of 0.8

Johnson and Johnson Vision Santa Ana has more employees than the Research and Development in the Physical median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.6 0.4 5 0 0
2017 0.4 0.4 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541711 · CA · Santa Ana

189 Research and Development in the Physical Engineering and Life Sciences employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 492 employers in Santa Ana, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Supernus Pharmaceuticals 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Danisco Us Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Teva Branded Pharma R&D at West Chester 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Genentech 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE TaylorMade Golf Carlsbad 772 FTE
STATE-SIZE rePlanet LLC 772 FTE
STATE-SIZE Robotics and Digital Solutions Santa Clara 773 FTE
STATE-SIZE 04-SA 771 FTE
CITY-NEAR Think Together 2,496 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Santa Ana 1,472 FTE
CITY-NEAR Orange County/Los Angeles 1,072 FTE
CITY-NEAR 056937-SANTA ANA CA P&DC 920 FTE
NAT-TCR Acushnet 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR North Canton GSL 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR HoneywellMN14 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sales - Old Town Alexandria, 1737 King Street 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE New York 772 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pioneer Building Services Inc 772 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hopewell VA12 772 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schneider Electric 772 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.