Private warehousing and storage (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) · Arizona

Johnson Controls, Phoenix Warehouse

Phoenix, AZ · ~71 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Johnson Controls, Phoenix Warehouse runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Private warehousing and storage (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) workplace, earning a grade B.

Johnson Controls, Phoenix Warehouse: 4.1 TCR = 71% of Private warehousing and storage (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) BLS 5.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Johnson Controls, Phoenix Warehouse safety composite

Johnson Controls, Phoenix Warehouse scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.7

2016→2019

Johnson Controls, Phoenix Warehouse injury rate improved

Johnson Controls, Phoenix Warehouse's TCR fell 9.7 from 9.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.7 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.7 · 2017=6.7 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493190 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 4.1 · 71% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/10
  • PHOTO Torrance B112
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Torrance B112 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Johnson Controls, Phoenix Warehouse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Johnson Controls, Phoenix Warehouse averages 4.1 TCR (71% of the Private warehousing and storage (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Johnson Controls, Phoenix Warehouse TCR series: 2016=9.7 · 2017=6.7 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Johnson Controls, Phoenix Warehouse falls in its industry

453 Private warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 10 Private warehousing and storag employers in Arizona.

Johnson Controls, Phoenix Warehouse (71 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Johnson Controls, Phoenix Warehouse
Johnson Controls, Phoenix Warehouse (71 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Johnson Controls, Phoenix Warehouse has more employees than the Private warehousing and storage (except median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 6.7 4.0 5 0 0
2016 9.7 5.5 5 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493190 · AZ · Phoenix

453 Private warehousing and storage (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Torrance B112 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wesco - Haas Group International Atlanta Distribution Center 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR AWC Portland 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lowell International Co. 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dorn Homes 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Solon Corporation 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Five Guys Services Main Operations 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Headlee Roofing 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR JR Simplot Company, Food-Trans-Caldwell 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Liberty NC Breeders 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-Swy 0029 2118 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-Swy 0025 2707 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fab Shop Anderson 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE sumter iga wesmark 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Belina Interiors, Inc. 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Total Company 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.