Air-conditioning condensers and condensing units manufacturing · Texas

Johnson Controls San Antonio Chillers

San Antonio, TX · ~202 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Johnson Controls San Antonio Chillers runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Air-conditioning condensers and condensing units manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Johnson Controls San Antonio Chillers: 1.3 TCR = 38% of Air-conditioning condensers and condensing units manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Johnson Controls San Antonio Chillers safety composite

Johnson Controls San Antonio Chillers scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Johnson Controls San Antonio Chillers: 1.3 → 1.7 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 1.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.67× in 2018

Johnson Controls San Antonio Chillers's TCR rose 0.4 from 1.3 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333415 · San Antonio, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 38% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #9/52
  • PHOTO High Point Plant
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~202 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: High Point Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Johnson Controls San Antonio Chillers in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Johnson Controls San Antonio Chillers averages 1.3 TCR (38% of the Air-conditioning condensers and condensing units manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Johnson Controls San Antonio Chillers TCR series: 2016=1.3 · 2017=0.8 · 2018=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Johnson Controls San Antonio Chillers falls in its industry

461 Air-conditioning condensers an establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 52 Air-conditioning condensers an employers in Texas.

Johnson Controls San Antonio Chillers (202 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Johnson Controls San Antonio Chillers
Johnson Controls San Antonio Chillers (202 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Johnson Controls San Antonio Chillers has more employees than the Air-conditioning condensers and condensi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.7 0.8 4 0 0
2017 0.8 0.8 2 0 0
2016 1.3 0.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333415 · TX · San Antonio

461 Air-conditioning condensers and condensing units manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR High Point Plant 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR NA Mfg Ironton 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Linde Inc. (formerly Praxair Inc.) Food Freezer Division 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commercial HVAC Americas : MFG-Columbia, SC-USA 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Greenspoint Service Center 202 FTE
STATE-SIZE 31041 - GOODYEAR - BEAUMONT 202 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cutlass Solar 2 202 FTE
STATE-SIZE L.A. Fuller & Sons Construction Ltd. 202 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR BOH Production 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Con-Jel Sales - Division of Joshen Paper & Packaging 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Schaumburg 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Marukai West La 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dean IL - Harvard 202 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mount Olive Facility 202 FTE
NAT-SIZE Consolidated Metco - Corporate Office 202 FTE
NAT-SIZE HealthSouth Corporation 202 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.