Skids and pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Johnson Industries

Sharpsville, PA · ~35 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Johnson Industries runs at 308% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skids and pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Johnson Industries: 10.2 TCR = 308% of Skids and pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Johnson Industries safety composite

Johnson Industries scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Johnson Industries: 3.5 → 4.7 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 16.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2020

Johnson Industries's TCR rose 1.2 from 3.5 in 2016 to 4.7 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 16.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321920 · Sharpsville, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.2 · 308% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #40/62
  • PHOTO A&L Wood Inc.
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: A&L Wood Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Johnson Industries in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Johnson Industries averages 10.2 TCR (308% of the Skids and pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Johnson Industries TCR series: 2016=3.5 · 2017=16.5 · 2018=14.4 · 2019=11.6 · 2020=4.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Johnson Industries falls in its industry

952 Skids and pallets, wood or woo establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #40 safest of 62 Skids and pallets, wood or woo employers in Pennsylvania.

Johnson Industries (35 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Johnson Industries
Johnson Industries (35 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3

Johnson Industries has fewer employees than the Skids and pallets, wood or wood and meta median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 4.7 0.0 1 0 0
2019 11.6 11.6 4 0 0
2018 14.4 14.4 5 0 0
2017 16.5 3.3 5 0 0
2016 3.5 2.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321920 · PA · Sharpsville

952 Skids and pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 8 employers in Sharpsville, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR A&L Wood Inc. 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kamps Taylor 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Georgetown Wood & Pallet Co. Inc, 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Millwood Inc.- Melrose Park 10.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE W.A.C. Mushrooms Inc. 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Highland Oysters 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mushroom Spawning, Inc. 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE PANTHER CREEK POWER OPERATING 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dean Dairy - Sharpsville 229 FTE
CITY-NEAR DFA FLUID - SHARPSVILLE PA 193 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dean Dairy - Sharpsville - DTI 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sharpsville Container 51 FTE
NAT-TCR Lutheran Church Home at GreenField, Inc. DBA GreenField Court 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Jonathan's Sprouts Inc. 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Quarry Hill 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 100 Wampanoag Trail Operating Company, LLC 10.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Schneiderman's Furniture Plymouth 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arrow Carton Company 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE PW-Management Support 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Service Transport Group, INC 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.