Aluminum compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing · Georgia

Johnson Matthey Process Technologies

Savannah, GA · ~180 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Johnson Matthey Process Technologies runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aluminum compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Johnson Matthey Process Technologies: 2.0 TCR = 62% of Aluminum compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Johnson Matthey Process Technologies safety composite

Johnson Matthey Process Technologies scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Johnson Matthey Process Technologies: 1.7 → 2.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.59× in 2024

Johnson Matthey Process Technologies's TCR rose 0.7 from 1.7 in 2023 to 2.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325180 · Savannah, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 62% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #12/21
  • PHOTO Criterion Catalysts
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~180 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Criterion Catalysts (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Johnson Matthey Process Technologies in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Johnson Matthey Process Technologies averages 2.0 TCR (62% of the Aluminum compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Johnson Matthey Process Technologies TCR series: 2023=1.7 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Johnson Matthey Process Technologies falls in its industry

418 Aluminum compounds, not specif establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 21 Aluminum compounds, not specif employers in Georgia.

Johnson Matthey Process Technologies (180 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Johnson Matthey Process Technologies
Johnson Matthey Process Technologies (180 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Johnson Matthey Process Technologies has more employees than the Aluminum compounds, not specified elsewh median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 1.2 3 1 0
2023 1.7 1.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325180 · GA · Savannah

418 Aluminum compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 511 employers in Savannah, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Criterion Catalysts 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Burnside 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sentry Industries 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PRAYON 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Savannah Operating 3102 Kilowatt Dr Savannah 180 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mid-South Roof Systems 180 FTE
STATE-SIZE Reid & Reid Construction LLC 180 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oakcrest Lumber Inc. 180 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gulfstream Aerospace 13,245 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Health University Medical Center 3,186 FTE
CITY-NEAR Savannah College of Art and Design 2,369 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Health University Medical 2,056 FTE
NAT-TCR USA Grand Rapids 4560 Pederson Ct 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Brown Sand INC 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Denn-Co Construction 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Advanced Acoustic Contractors 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Otis Elevator Company- OECF Bristol Research Center 180 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thieneman Construction, Inc. 180 FTE
NAT-SIZE Five Rivers Medical Center 180 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kings Card Club/WestLane Card Room/Kings Kitchen and Bar 180 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.