Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing · Michigan

Johnson Technology, Inc.

Muskegon, MI · ~323 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Johnson Technology, Inc. runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Johnson Technology, Inc.: 0.6 TCR = 19% of Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Johnson Technology, Inc. safety composite

Johnson Technology, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Johnson Technology, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Johnson Technology, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.1 from 0.6 in 2023 to 0.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=0.6 · 2024=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Muskegon, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/20
  • PHOTO Services Durham NC
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~323 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Services Durham NC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Johnson Technology, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Johnson Technology, Inc. averages 0.6 TCR (19% of the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Johnson Technology, Inc. TCR series: 2023=0.6 · 2024=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Johnson Technology, Inc. falls in its industry

366 Aircraft engine and engine par establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 20 Aircraft engine and engine par employers in Michigan.

Johnson Technology, Inc. (323 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Johnson Technology, Inc.
Johnson Technology, Inc. (323 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Johnson Technology, Inc. has more employees than the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.7 0.0 0 2 0
2023 0.6 0.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · MI · Muskegon

366 Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 230 employers in Muskegon, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Services Durham NC 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aerospace : Mentor 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR BizJet 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Supply Chain : Hooksett, NH 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE 3940_7625 323 FTE
STATE-SIZE WEBASTO Roof Systems 323 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate/Zeeland 323 FTE
STATE-SIZE US Foods Detroit 323 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Partners - Sherman Campus 3,461 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Partners-1500 E Sherman BLVD-MH-MI 2,598 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Partners - Hackley 1,329 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Arena 861 FTE
NAT-TCR Waterproofing Associates, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR District Service Center 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Air Cruisers Company / Vest Plant 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Plasma Technology Inc 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Royal Lahaina Resort 323 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rosenbauer Minnesota 323 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fred Finch Youth and Family Services 323 FTE
NAT-SIZE Graves Gilbert Clinic - Main 323 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.