Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Texas

Jormac Aerospace - Dallas, Texas

Lewisville, TX · ~40 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jormac Aerospace - Dallas, Texas runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Jormac Aerospace - Dallas, Texas: 2.3 TCR = 68% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jormac Aerospace - Dallas, Texas safety composite

Jormac Aerospace - Dallas, Texas scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Jormac Aerospace - Dallas, Texas: 0.0 → 4.5 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 4.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2019

Jormac Aerospace - Dallas, Texas's TCR rose 4.5 from 0.0 in 2018 to 4.5 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Lewisville, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 68% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #23/39
  • PHOTO Applied Solutions Gr…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Applied Solutions Group (ASG) : ANCRA Azusa (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Jormac Aerospace - Dallas, Texas in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jormac Aerospace - Dallas, Texas averages 2.3 TCR (68% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jormac Aerospace - Dallas, Texas TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=4.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Jormac Aerospace - Dallas, Texas falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 39 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Texas.

Jormac Aerospace - Dallas, Texas (40 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Jormac Aerospace - Dallas, Texas
Jormac Aerospace - Dallas, Texas (40 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Jormac Aerospace - Dallas, Texas has fewer employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 4.5 0.0 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · TX · Lewisville

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 242 employers in Lewisville, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Applied Solutions Group (ASG) : ANCRA Azusa 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR GKN Aerospace, Inc 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR United Engineering Co. 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR NMG Aerospace East - Hudson Drive 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE RCB Ventures, LLC dba Tri-Tex Grass 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cook Canyon Ranch 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frontier Feedyard 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kurten Location 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kent Companies TX 1,380 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unit #9900 1,168 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical City Lewisville 872 FTE
CITY-NEAR Metro Auto Auction Dallas 856 FTE
NAT-TCR Florida Septic, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Easter Seals Hawaii - Kapaa Service Center 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR National Publishing 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Kaman's Art Shoppes, Inc. 56 BVA 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rotadyne Roll Group Romeoville 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 01 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Electrical Distribution Cooperative 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elgin Recycling Non-Ferrous Facility 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.