Heavy machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · Montana

Joy Global dba Komatsu Mining

Billings, MT · ~26 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Joy Global dba Komatsu Mining runs at 37% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Heavy machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade A.

Joy Global dba Komatsu Mining: 0.8 TCR = 37% of Heavy machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Joy Global dba Komatsu Mining safety composite

Joy Global dba Komatsu Mining scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Joy Global dba Komatsu Mining: 0.0 → 3.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Joy Global dba Komatsu Mining's TCR rose 3.9 from 0.0 in 2020 to 3.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Billings, MT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 37% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/7
  • PHOTO Farmingdale
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Farmingdale (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Montana employers → · Look up another →

Joy Global dba Komatsu Mining in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Joy Global dba Komatsu Mining averages 0.8 TCR (37% of the Heavy machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Joy Global dba Komatsu Mining TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 2.1

Where Joy Global dba Komatsu Mining falls in its industry

2,560 Heavy machinery and equipment establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Montana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 7 Heavy machinery and equipment employers in Montana.

Joy Global dba Komatsu Mining (26 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Joy Global dba Komatsu Mining
Joy Global dba Komatsu Mining (26 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Joy Global dba Komatsu Mining has fewer employees than the Heavy machinery and equipment repair and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · MT · Billings

2,560 Heavy machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,536 rated employers in Montana with headcount on file · 327 employers in Billings, MT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Farmingdale 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Industrial Electro Mechanics 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SPATCO Energy Solutions, LLC - Dallas 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Southeast : SVC-Baton Rouge LA-USA 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Parke Logging Inc. 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rainbow Dam 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sheridan Electric Co-op, Inc. 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Guy Tabacco Construction 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Billings Clinic Hospital 2,366 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Vincent Healthcare 1,860 FTE
CITY-NEAR Billings Clinic Downtown Campus 1,223 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. John's Lutheran Ministries 651 FTE
NAT-TCR Cart.com - Dallas 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Danbury Mission Technologies 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 3400 Cedar 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Performance Cabling Technologies, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Heywood Builders Inc 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houston Products Processing, Inc. (dba HPP Corp) 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Claude H Nix Construction 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Town of East Haven- General Government 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.